Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
57 kcal
Score
19 / 100
Yaban çileği has a higher nutrition quality score (51) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
32 vs 57(+78.1%)
Score Diff
51 vs 19(-62.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yaban çileği
Higher energy
Akça armut
Score leader
Yaban çileği
Nutrient split
14 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Yaban çileği and Akça armut are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Yaban çileği has 32.0 kcal and Akça armut has 57.0 kcal. The difference is 25.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 51 and 19. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Yaban çileği | Akça armut | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.024 mg | 0.012 mg | -50.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.022 mg | 0.026 mg | +18.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.047 mg | 0.029 mg | -38.3% |
| Bakir | 0.048 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 58 mg | 4.3 mg | -92.6% |
| Demir | 0.38 mg | 0.18 mg | -52.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.2 g | 3.1 g | +40.9% |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | 32 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 24 µg | 7 µg | -70.8% |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 12 mg | -50.0% |
| Fruktoz | — | 6.22 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 2.76 g | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 2.2 µg | 4.4 µg | +100.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 9 mg | -43.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 15.2 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 8.5 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 13 mg | 7 mg | -46.2% |
| Mangan | 0.3 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.36 mg | 0.161 mg | -55.3% |
| Potasyum | 153 mg | 116 mg | -24.2% |
| Protein | 0.67 g | 0.36 g | -46.3% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 0.77 g | — |
| Selenyum | 0.2 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | — | 1 mg | — |
| Su | 90.95 g | 83.8 g | -7.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0.14 g | -53.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.5 g | 9.75 g | +77.3% |
| Çinko | 0.13 mg | 0.1 mg | -23.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Yaban çileği and Akça armut.
Yaban çileği has less energy per 100 g (32 kcal versus 57 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Yaban çileği has 2.2 µg and Akça armut has 4.4 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Yaban çileği 51, Akça armut 19.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.