Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
234 kcal
Score
35 / 100
Big Mac (Sosuz) has a higher nutrition quality score (35) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
326 vs 234(-28.2%)
Score Diff
11 vs 35(+218.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Big Mac (Sosuz)
Higher energy
Wendy'S, Tavuk Parça
Score leader
Big Mac (Sosuz)
Nutrient split
13 - 17 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Wendy'S, Tavuk Parça and Big Mac (Sosuz) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Wendy'S, Tavuk Parça has 326.0 kcal and Big Mac (Sosuz) has 234.0 kcal. The difference is 92.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 11 and 35. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
31 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Wendy'S, Tavuk Parça | Big Mac (Sosuz) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 186 iu | — |
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | 0.77 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.19 mg | +137.5% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.33 µg | 0.94 µg | +184.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | 0.22 mg | +83.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.25 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.06 mg | 0.1 mg | +66.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.3 mg | 0.4 mg | -69.2% |
| Demir | 0.62 mg | 2.14 mg | +245.2% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | — | 1.7 g | — |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Enerji | 326 kj | 978 kj | +200.0% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 271 mg | 130 mg | -52.0% |
| Fruktoz | 0 g | 1.74 g | — |
| Galaktoz | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Glikoz | 0 g | 0.96 g | — |
| K Vitamini (dihidrofilokinon) | 17.1 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 8 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 11 mg | 124 mg | +1027.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.31 g | 21.01 g | +46.8% |
| Kolesterol | 50 mg | 35 mg | -30.0% |
| Kül | 2.52 g | 1.91 g | -24.2% |
| Laktoz | 0 g | 0.35 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 21 mg | -4.5% |
| Maltoz | 0.08 g | 0.47 g | +487.5% |
| Mangan | 0.19 mg | 0.22 mg | +15.8% |
| MUFA 14:1 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| MUFA 15:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.36 g | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 c | 0.36 g | — | — |
| MUFA 17:1 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 5.64 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 c | 5.6 g | — | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.1 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 c | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 24:1 c | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 6.04 mg | 3.69 mg | -38.9% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.91 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 250 mg | 192 mg | -23.2% |
| Protein | 16.46 g | 12.79 g | -22.3% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 9.19 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:2 CLA | 0.03 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:2 n-6 c,c | 9.04 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.81 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 n-6 | 0.04 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:2 n-6 | 0.02 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 | 0.02 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 n-3 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 n-6 | 0.02 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.06 g | — | — |
| PUFA 22:4 | 0.02 g | — | — |
| Sakkaroz | 0 g | 0.21 g | — |
| Selenyum | 25 µg | — | — |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.07 g | — | — |
| SFA 15:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 3.4 g | — | — |
| SFA 17:0 | 0.02 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 1.11 g | — | — |
| SFA 20:0 | 0.06 g | — | — |
| SFA 22:0 | 0.05 g | — | — |
| SFA 24:0 | 0.02 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.03 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 708 mg | 454 mg | -35.9% |
| Su | 44.15 g | 52.76 g | +19.5% |
| TFA 16:1 t | 0 g | — | — |
| TFA 18:1 t | 0.04 g | — | — |
| TFA 18:2 t (tanımsız) | 0.11 g | — | — |
| TFA 22:1 t | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.79 g | 4.16 g | -13.2% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 50 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.14 g | 3.8 g | -38.1% |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | 0.16 g | — | — |
| Toplam trans-monoenoik yağ asitleri | 0.05 g | — | — |
| Toplam trans-poliinoik yağ asitleri | 0.11 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 22.55 g | 11.57 g | -48.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 10.12 g | 0.33 g | -96.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.08 g | 3.7 g | +4525.0% |
| Çinko | 0.61 mg | 2.07 mg | +239.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Wendy'S, Tavuk Parça and Big Mac (Sosuz).
Big Mac (Sosuz) has less energy per 100 g (234 kcal versus 326 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Wendy'S, Tavuk Parça has 0.08 g and Big Mac (Sosuz) has 3.7 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Wendy'S, Tavuk Parça 11, Big Mac (Sosuz) 35.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.