Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
53 kcal
Score
32 / 100
Dana Sosu has a higher nutrition quality score (32) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
165 vs 53(-67.9%)
Score Diff
26 vs 32(+23.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Dana Sosu
Higher energy
Peynirli Ekmek
Score leader
Dana Sosu
Nutrient split
46 - 7 (tie: 12)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Peynirli Ekmek and Dana Sosu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Peynirli Ekmek has 165.0 kcal and Dana Sosu has 53.0 kcal. The difference is 112.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 26 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Peynirli Ekmek | Dana Sosu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 149 µg | 1 µg | -99.3% |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | 0.03 mg | -50.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.38 µg | 0.1 µg | -73.7% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | 0.04 mg | -81.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.05 mg | 0.01 mg | -80.0% |
| Bakir | 0.01 mg | 0.1 mg | +900.0% |
| Besin folati | 4 µg | 2 µg | -50.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 34 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.1 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| D Vitamini | 1.2 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Demir | 0.16 mg | 0.7 mg | +337.5% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0.1 g | 0.4 g | +300.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.61 mg | 0.02 mg | -96.7% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 165 kj | 53 kj | -67.9% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 8 µg | 2 µg | -75.0% |
| Folik asit | 2 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Fosfor | 176 mg | 30 mg | -83.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 5.2 µg | 0.1 µg | -98.1% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 241 mg | 6 mg | -97.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6.32 g | 4.81 g | -23.9% |
| Kolesterol | 26 mg | 3 mg | -88.5% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | 1 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 16 mg | 2 mg | -87.5% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.13 g | 0.1 g | -23.1% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 3.7 g | 0.85 g | -77.0% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.02 g | 0.01 g | -50.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.24 mg | 0.66 mg | +175.0% |
| Potasyum | 151 mg | 81 mg | -46.4% |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 3.75 g | -50.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 1.38 g | 0.07 g | -94.9% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.13 g | 0.01 g | -92.3% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Retinol | 146 µg | 1 µg | -99.3% |
| Selenyum | 7.3 µg | 1 µg | -86.3% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.21 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.24 g | 0.02 g | -91.7% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.76 g | 0.09 g | -88.2% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 2.57 g | 0.59 g | -77.0% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 1.12 g | 0.45 g | -59.8% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0.16 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 6:0 | 0.13 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.09 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Sodyum | 280 mg | 633 mg | +126.1% |
| Su | 72.25 g | 87.48 g | +21.1% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 5.45 g | 1.15 g | -78.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 7 µg | 2 µg | -71.4% |
| Toplam Kolin | 14.6 mg | 6.3 mg | -56.8% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.71 g | 0.96 g | -74.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 12.26 g | 2.36 g | -80.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.49 g | 0.08 g | -94.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.21 g | 0.21 g | -95.0% |
| Çinko | 1.08 mg | 1 mg | -7.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Peynirli Ekmek and Dana Sosu.
Dana Sosu has less energy per 100 g (53 kcal versus 165 kcal).
For measured Bakir, Peynirli Ekmek has 0.01 mg and Dana Sosu has 0.1 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Peynirli Ekmek 26, Dana Sosu 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.