Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
324.2 kcal
Score
55 / 100
Amchur has a higher nutrition quality score (55) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
45 vs 324.2(+620.4%)
Score Diff
50 vs 55(+10.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Amchur
Higher energy
Amchur
Score leader
Amchur
Nutrient split
6 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Wakame yosunu and Amchur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Wakame yosunu has 45.0 kcal and Amchur has 324.2 kcal. The difference is 279.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 50 and 55. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Wakame yosunu | Amchur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 18 µg | 22 µg | +22.2% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | 0.08 mg | +33.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.23 mg | 0.09 mg | -60.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.22 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.28 mg | 0.35 mg | +25.0% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 260 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3 mg | 52 mg | +1633.3% |
| Demir | 2.18 mg | 24.5 mg | +1023.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 12.8 g | +2460.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 28 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 80 mg | 75 mg | -6.3% |
| İyot | 4200 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 5.3 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 150 mg | 180 mg | +20.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 9.14 g | 80.2 g | +777.5% |
| Kül | — | 5.3 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 107 mg | 82 mg | -23.4% |
| Mangan | 1.4 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.6 mg | 1.4 mg | -12.5% |
| Potasyum | 50 mg | 640 mg | +1180.0% |
| Protein | 3.03 g | 3.2 g | +5.6% |
| Sodyum | 872 mg | 35 mg | -96.0% |
| Su | 80 g | 9.5 g | -88.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 196 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.64 g | 1.8 g | +181.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 21.4 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.38 mg | 1.1 mg | +189.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Wakame yosunu and Amchur.
Wakame yosunu has less energy per 100 g (45 kcal versus 324.2 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Wakame yosunu has 0.5 g and Amchur has 12.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Wakame yosunu 50, Amchur 55.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.