Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
263 kcal
Score
6 / 100
Üzüm pestili has a higher nutrition quality score (19) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
334.2 vs 263(-21.3%)
Score Diff
19 vs 6(-68.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Üzüm pestili
Higher energy
Üzüm pestili
Score leader
Üzüm pestili
Nutrient split
15 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Üzüm pestili and Ahududu reçeli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Üzüm pestili has 334.2 kcal and Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal. The difference is 71.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 19 and 6. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Üzüm pestili | Ahududu reçeli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 2 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.22 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.35 mg | 0.04 mg | -88.6% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.2 mg | 8 mg | +90.5% |
| Demir | 3.4 mg | 0.4 mg | -88.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.2 g | 1.1 g | -65.6% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 263 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 16 µg | 5 µg | -68.8% |
| Fosfor | 65 mg | 9 mg | -86.2% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 115 mg | 15 mg | -87.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 79.8 g | 68 g | -14.8% |
| Kül | 2.12 g | 0.3 g | -85.8% |
| Magnezyum | 58 mg | 6 mg | -89.7% |
| Mangan | 0.62 mg | 0.15 mg | -75.8% |
| Niasin | 1.1 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 720 mg | 77 mg | -89.3% |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 0.4 g | -83.3% |
| Sodyum | 28 mg | 12 mg | -57.1% |
| Su | 14.1 g | 30.2 g | +114.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.12 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.58 g | 0.1 g | -82.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 58.5 g | 60.3 g | +3.1% |
| Çinko | 0.88 mg | 0.08 mg | -90.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Üzüm pestili and Ahududu reçeli.
Ahududu reçeli has less energy per 100 g (263 kcal versus 334.2 kcal).
For measured Su, Üzüm pestili has 14.1 g and Ahududu reçeli has 30.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Üzüm pestili 19, Ahududu reçeli 6.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.