Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
304 kcal
Score
2 / 100
Üzüm Pekmezi (Zile) has a higher nutrition quality score (28) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
301 vs 304(+1.0%)
Score Diff
28 vs 2(-92.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Üzüm Pekmezi (Zile)
Higher energy
Akasya Balı
Score leader
Üzüm Pekmezi (Zile)
Nutrient split
18 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Üzüm Pekmezi (Zile) and Akasya Balı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Üzüm Pekmezi (Zile) has 301.0 kcal and Akasya Balı has 304.0 kcal. The difference is 3.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 28 and 2. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Üzüm Pekmezi (Zile) | Akasya Balı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | 0.038 mg | -65.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.28 mg | 0.024 mg | -91.4% |
| Bakir | 0.32 mg | 0.036 mg | -88.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.8 mg | 0.5 mg | -72.2% |
| Demir | 5.8 mg | 0.42 mg | -92.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.3 g | 0.2 g | -33.3% |
| Folat DFE | — | 2 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 52 mg | 4 mg | -92.3% |
| Fruktoz | 32.8 g | 43.5 g | +32.6% |
| Glikoz | 34.2 g | 29.8 g | -12.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 182 mg | 6 mg | -96.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 73.1 g | 82.4 g | +12.7% |
| Kül | 1.5 g | 0.2 g | -86.7% |
| Magnezyum | 48 mg | 2 mg | -95.8% |
| Maltoz | — | 2.1 g | — |
| Mangan | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| Niasin | 1.45 mg | 0.12 mg | -91.7% |
| Potasyum | 1150 mg | 52 mg | -95.5% |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 0.3 g | -78.6% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 1.9 g | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0.8 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 28 mg | 4 mg | -85.7% |
| Su | 23.8 g | 17.1 g | -28.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 67.5 g | 82.1 g | +21.6% |
| Çinko | 0.95 mg | 0.22 mg | -76.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Üzüm Pekmezi (Zile) and Akasya Balı.
Üzüm Pekmezi (Zile) has less energy per 100 g (301 kcal versus 304 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Üzüm Pekmezi (Zile) has 0.2 g and Akasya Balı has 0 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Üzüm Pekmezi (Zile) 28, Akasya Balı 2.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.