Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
27 kcal
Score
68 / 100
Uçkur kabağı has a higher nutrition quality score (82) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
17 vs 27(+58.8%)
Score Diff
82 vs 68(-17.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Uçkur kabağı
Higher energy
Alabaş (Kohlrabi)
Score leader
Uçkur kabağı
Nutrient split
4 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Uçkur kabağı and Alabaş (Kohlrabi) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Uçkur kabağı has 17.0 kcal and Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 27.0 kcal. The difference is 10.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 82 and 68. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Uçkur kabağı | Alabaş (Kohlrabi) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 8 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.029 mg | 0.05 mg | +72.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.022 mg | 0.02 mg | -9.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | 0.15 mg | +275.0% |
| Bakir | 0.034 mg | 0.129 mg | +279.4% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 10.1 mg | 62 mg | +513.9% |
| Demir | 0.2 mg | 0.4 mg | +100.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.2 g | 3.6 g | +200.0% |
| Folat DFE | 6 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 13 mg | 46 mg | +253.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.1 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 26 mg | 24 mg | -7.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.39 g | 6.2 g | +82.9% |
| Kül | — | 1 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 11 mg | 19 mg | +72.7% |
| Mangan | 0.082 mg | 0.139 mg | +69.5% |
| Niasin | 0.32 mg | 0.4 mg | +25.0% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.165 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 150 mg | 350 mg | +133.3% |
| Protein | 0.62 g | 1.7 g | +174.2% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 20 mg | +900.0% |
| Su | 94.5 g | 91 g | -3.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.013 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 16 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 12.3 mg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.02 g | 0.1 g | +400.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 2.6 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.7 mg | 0.03 mg | -95.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Uçkur kabağı and Alabaş (Kohlrabi).
Uçkur kabağı has less energy per 100 g (17 kcal versus 27 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Uçkur kabağı has 2 mg and Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 20 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Uçkur kabağı 82, Alabaş (Kohlrabi) 68.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.