Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
47 kcal
Score
22 / 100
Turunç Meyvesi has a higher nutrition quality score (44) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
42 vs 47(+11.9%)
Score Diff
44 vs 22(-50.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Turunç Meyvesi
Higher energy
Akça armudu
Score leader
Turunç Meyvesi
Nutrient split
11 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Turunç Meyvesi and Akça armudu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Turunç Meyvesi has 42.0 kcal and Akça armudu has 47.0 kcal. The difference is 5.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 44 and 22. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
14 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Turunç Meyvesi | Akça armudu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 11 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.03 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.05 mg | 0.028 mg | -44.0% |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | 0.082 mg | +105.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 135 µg | 14 µg | -89.6% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 45 mg | 4.3 mg | -90.4% |
| Demir | 0.35 mg | 0.18 mg | -48.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.1 g | 2.8 g | +33.3% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 47 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 19 mg | 11 mg | -42.1% |
| Fruktoz | — | 6.2 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 2.8 g | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 4.4 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 42 mg | 9 mg | -78.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 9.7 g | 12.4 g | +27.8% |
| Magnezyum | 11 mg | 7 mg | -36.4% |
| Malik asit | — | 250 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 195 mg | 116 mg | -40.5% |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.38 g | -45.7% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | — | — |
| Su | 87.2 g | 85.5 g | -1.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 18 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.12 g | -40.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 6.2 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.11 mg | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Turunç Meyvesi and Akça armudu.
Turunç Meyvesi has less energy per 100 g (42 kcal versus 47 kcal).
For measured Bakir, Turunç Meyvesi has 0.04 mg and Akça armudu has 0.082 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Turunç Meyvesi 44, Akça armudu 22.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.