Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
43 kcal
Score
26 / 100
Turşulu Turp has a higher nutrition quality score (27) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
44 vs 43(-2.3%)
Score Diff
27 vs 26(-3.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Turşulu Turp
Higher energy
Turşulu Turp
Score leader
Turşulu Turp
Nutrient split
15 - 22 (tie: 28)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Turşulu Turp and Biber, Tatlı, Turşu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Turşulu Turp has 44.0 kcal and Biber, Tatlı, Turşu has 43.0 kcal. The difference is 1.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 27 and 26. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Turşulu Turp | Biber, Tatlı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | 69 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 16 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | 0.04 mg | +33.3% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.03 mg | 0.09 mg | +200.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.07 mg | 0.2 mg | +185.7% |
| Bakir | 0.07 mg | 0.04 mg | -42.9% |
| Besin folati | 11 µg | 24 µg | +118.2% |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | 722 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 196 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 14.8 mg | 85 mg | +474.3% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.25 mg | 0.23 mg | -8.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1.5 g | 0.9 g | -40.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.02 mg | 0.81 mg | +3950.0% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 44 kj | 43 kj | -2.3% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 11 µg | 24 µg | +118.2% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 23 mg | 18 mg | -21.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.1 µg | 5.1 µg | +5000.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 27 mg | 7 mg | -74.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 10.19 g | 9.6 g | -5.8% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | 154 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 9 mg | 8 mg | -11.1% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.32 mg | 0.65 mg | +103.1% |
| Potasyum | 159 mg | 156 mg | -1.9% |
| Protein | 0.75 g | 0.67 g | -10.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.01 g | 0.06 g | +500.0% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.03 g | 0.03 g | 0.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 0.6 µg | 0.1 µg | -83.3% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.01 g | 0.04 g | +300.0% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 1000 mg | 944 mg | -5.6% |
| Su | 85.69 g | 86.65 g | +1.1% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.01 g | 0.05 g | +400.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 11 µg | 24 µg | +118.2% |
| Toplam Kolin | 9.2 mg | 4.6 mg | -50.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.12 g | +20.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.04 g | 0.09 g | +125.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 8.02 g | 7.61 g | -5.1% |
| Çinko | 0.22 mg | 0.14 mg | -36.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Turşulu Turp and Biber, Tatlı, Turşu.
Biber, Tatlı has less energy per 100 g (43 kcal versus 44 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Turşulu Turp has 0.1 µg and Biber, Tatlı has 5.1 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Turşulu Turp 27, Biber, Tatlı 26.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.