Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
294 kcal
Score
20 / 100
Tire Şiş Köfte has a higher nutrition quality score (48) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
266 vs 294(+10.5%)
Score Diff
48 vs 20(-58.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tire Şiş Köfte
Higher energy
Acuka (Muhammara)
Score leader
Tire Şiş Köfte
Nutrient split
5 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tire Şiş Köfte and Acuka (Muhammara) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tire Şiş Köfte has 266.0 kcal and Acuka (Muhammara) has 294.0 kcal. The difference is 28.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 48 and 20. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
13 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tire Şiş Köfte | Acuka (Muhammara) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 120 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.35 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.38 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 1100 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 15 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.4 mg | 1.8 mg | -25.0% |
| Diyet lifi | — | 3.5 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 3.2 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 35 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 210 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 45 mg | +150.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.8 g | 15 g | +1775.0% |
| Kolesterol | 78 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 2.1 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 60 mg | +185.7% |
| Niasin | 5.8 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 320 mg | 450 mg | +40.6% |
| Protein | 22.5 g | 4.5 g | -80.0% |
| Selenyum | 24.2 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 520 mg | 850 mg | +63.5% |
| Su | 55.4 g | 48 g | -13.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 8.2 g | 2.8 g | -65.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 8.9 g | 12.5 g | +40.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 19.2 g | 24 g | +25.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.8 g | 7.5 g | +837.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 4.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 5.1 mg | 0.9 mg | -82.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tire Şiş Köfte and Acuka (Muhammara).
Tire Şiş Köfte has less energy per 100 g (266 kcal versus 294 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Tire Şiş Köfte has 0.8 g and Acuka (Muhammara) has 15 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tire Şiş Köfte 48, Acuka (Muhammara) 20.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.