Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
72 kcal
Score
45 / 100
Tere has a higher nutrition quality score (91) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
32 vs 72(+125.0%)
Score Diff
91 vs 45(-50.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tere
Higher energy
Arpacık Soğan
Score leader
Tere
Nutrient split
16 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tere and Arpacık Soğan are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tere has 32.0 kcal and Arpacık Soğan has 72.0 kcal. The difference is 40.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 91 and 45. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tere | Arpacık Soğan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 66 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 346 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.06 mg | -25.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.26 mg | 0.02 mg | -92.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.25 mg | 0.345 mg | +38.0% |
| Bakir | 0.17 mg | 0.088 mg | -48.2% |
| Beta Karoten | 4150 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 69 mg | 8 mg | -88.4% |
| Demir | 1.3 mg | 1.2 mg | -7.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.1 g | 3.2 g | +190.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.7 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 76 mg | 60 mg | -21.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 541.9 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 81 mg | 37 mg | -54.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 5.5 g | 16.8 g | +205.5% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 12500 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 38 mg | 21 mg | -44.7% |
| Mangan | 0.55 mg | 0.292 mg | -46.9% |
| Niasin | 1 mg | 0.2 mg | -80.0% |
| Potasyum | 606 mg | 334 mg | -44.9% |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 2.5 g | -3.8% |
| Selenyum | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 14 mg | 12 mg | -14.3% |
| Su | 89.4 g | 79.8 g | -10.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 80 µg | 34 µg | -57.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.7 g | 0.1 g | -85.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.4 g | 7.87 g | +78.9% |
| Çinko | 0.23 mg | 0.4 mg | +73.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tere and Arpacık Soğan.
Tere has less energy per 100 g (32 kcal versus 72 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Tere has 5.5 g and Arpacık Soğan has 16.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tere 91, Arpacık Soğan 45.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.