Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
337 kcal
Score
66 / 100
Anason Tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (66) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
251 vs 337(+34.3%)
Score Diff
56 vs 66(+17.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Anason Tohumu
Higher energy
Anason Tohumu
Score leader
Anason Tohumu
Nutrient split
7 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tellicherry Tane Karabiber and Anason Tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tellicherry Tane Karabiber has 251.0 kcal and Anason Tohumu has 337.0 kcal. The difference is 86.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 56 and 66. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tellicherry Tane Karabiber | Anason Tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | 0.34 mg | +209.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 0.29 mg | +61.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.29 mg | 0.65 mg | +124.1% |
| Bakir | 1.33 mg | 0.91 mg | -31.6% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 21 mg | — |
| Demir | 28.86 mg | 36.96 mg | +28.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 25.3 g | 14.6 g | -42.3% |
| Fosfor | 158 mg | 440 mg | +178.5% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 163.7 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 443 mg | 646 mg | +45.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 63.95 g | 50.02 g | -21.8% |
| Kül | 4.38 g | 7.04 g | +60.7% |
| Magnezyum | 171 mg | 170 mg | -0.6% |
| Mangan | 12.76 mg | 2.3 mg | -82.0% |
| Niasin | 1.14 mg | 3.06 mg | +168.4% |
| Potasyum | 1329 mg | 1441 mg | +8.4% |
| Protein | 10.39 g | 17.6 g | +69.4% |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 16 mg | -20.0% |
| Su | 12.46 g | 9.54 g | -23.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.59 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 10 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 9.78 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 3.26 g | 15.9 g | +387.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 3.15 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.19 mg | 5.3 mg | +345.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tellicherry Tane Karabiber and Anason Tohumu.
Tellicherry Tane Karabiber has less energy per 100 g (251 kcal versus 337 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Tellicherry Tane Karabiber has 3.26 g and Anason Tohumu has 15.9 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tellicherry Tane Karabiber 56, Anason Tohumu 66.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.