Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
102 kcal
Score
39 / 100
Alıç, Taze has a higher nutrition quality score (39) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
57 vs 102(+79.0%)
Score Diff
30 vs 39(+30.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alıç, Taze
Higher energy
Alıç, Taze
Score leader
Alıç, Taze
Nutrient split
5 - 14 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Taze Yaban Mersini and Alıç, Taze are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Taze Yaban Mersini has 57.0 kcal and Alıç, Taze has 102.0 kcal. The difference is 45.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 30 and 39. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Taze Yaban Mersini | Alıç, Taze | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 12 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.037 mg | 0.02 mg | -45.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.041 mg | 0.03 mg | -26.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.052 mg | 0.04 mg | -23.1% |
| Bakir | 0.057 mg | 0.12 mg | +110.5% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 9.7 mg | 21 mg | +116.5% |
| Demir | 0.28 mg | 0.9 mg | +221.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.4 g | 4.8 g | +100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.57 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 12 mg | 28 mg | +133.3% |
| Fruktoz | 4.97 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 4.88 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 19.3 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 6 mg | 22 mg | +266.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.49 g | 23.8 g | +64.3% |
| Kül | 0.24 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 80 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 6 mg | 21 mg | +250.0% |
| Mangan | 0.336 mg | 0.15 mg | -55.4% |
| Niasin | 0.418 mg | 0.5 mg | +19.6% |
| Potasyum | 77 mg | 299 mg | +288.3% |
| Protein | 0.74 g | 0.8 g | +8.1% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 1 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 84.21 g | 72 g | -14.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 6 µg | — | — |
| Toplam Kolin | 6 mg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.33 g | 0.5 g | +51.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.96 g | 12 g | +20.5% |
| Çinko | 0.16 mg | 0.2 mg | +25.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Taze Yaban Mersini and Alıç, Taze.
Taze Yaban Mersini has less energy per 100 g (57 kcal versus 102 kcal).
For measured Potasyum, Taze Yaban Mersini has 77 mg and Alıç, Taze has 299 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Taze Yaban Mersini 30, Alıç, Taze 39.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.