Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
15 kcal
Score
85 / 100
Acur has a higher nutrition quality score (85) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
149 vs 15(-89.9%)
Score Diff
44 vs 85(+93.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Acur
Higher energy
Taze Sarımsak
Score leader
Acur
Nutrient split
18 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Taze Sarımsak and Acur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Taze Sarımsak has 149.0 kcal and Acur has 15.0 kcal. The difference is 134.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 44 and 85. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Taze Sarımsak | Acur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.2 mg | 0.027 mg | -86.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | 0.033 mg | -70.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 1.235 mg | 0.04 mg | -96.8% |
| Bakir | 0.3 mg | 0.041 mg | -86.3% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 45 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 31.2 mg | 2.8 mg | -91.0% |
| Demir | 1.7 mg | 0.28 mg | -83.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.1 g | 0.5 g | -76.2% |
| Enerji | 623 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 149 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 7 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 153 mg | 24 mg | -84.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 16.4 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 181 mg | 16 mg | -91.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 33.06 g | 3.63 g | -89.0% |
| Kül | 1.5 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 13 mg | -48.0% |
| Mangan | 1.67 mg | 0.079 mg | -95.3% |
| Niasin | 0.7 mg | 0.098 mg | -86.0% |
| Potasyum | 401 mg | 147 mg | -63.3% |
| Protein | 6.36 g | 0.65 g | -89.8% |
| Selenyum | 14.2 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 17 mg | 2 mg | -88.2% |
| Su | 58.58 g | 95.23 g | +62.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.089 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 3 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.5 g | 0.11 g | -78.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1 g | 1.67 g | +67.0% |
| Çinko | 1.16 mg | 0.2 mg | -82.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Taze Sarımsak and Acur.
Acur has less energy per 100 g (15 kcal versus 149 kcal).
For measured B6 Vitamini, Taze Sarımsak has 1.235 mg and Acur has 0.04 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Taze Sarımsak 44, Acur 85.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.