Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
81 kcal
Score
62 / 100
Taze Biberiye has a higher nutrition quality score (76) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
131 vs 81(-38.2%)
Score Diff
76 vs 62(-18.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Taze Biberiye
Higher energy
Taze Biberiye
Score leader
Taze Biberiye
Nutrient split
11 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Taze Biberiye and Araka are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Taze Biberiye has 131.0 kcal and Araka has 81.0 kcal. The difference is 50.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 76 and 62. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Taze Biberiye | Araka | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 2924 iu | — | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 146 µg | 38 µg | -74.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.036 mg | 0.266 mg | +638.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.152 mg | 0.132 mg | -13.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.336 mg | 0.169 mg | -49.7% |
| Bakir | 0.301 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 21.8 mg | 40 mg | +83.5% |
| Demir | 6.65 mg | 1.47 mg | -77.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 14.1 g | 5.7 g | -59.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.13 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 109 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 66 mg | 108 mg | +63.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 24.8 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 317 mg | 25 mg | -92.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 20.7 g | 14.45 g | -30.2% |
| Kül | 2.33 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 91 mg | 33 mg | -63.7% |
| Mangan | 0.96 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.912 mg | 2.09 mg | +129.2% |
| Potasyum | 668 mg | 244 mg | -63.5% |
| Protein | 3.31 g | 5.42 g | +63.7% |
| Sodyum | 26 mg | 5 mg | -80.8% |
| Su | 67.77 g | 78.86 g | +16.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.84 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 65 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.16 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5.86 g | 0.4 g | -93.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.9 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 5.67 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.93 mg | 1.24 mg | +33.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Taze Biberiye and Araka.
Araka has less energy per 100 g (81 kcal versus 131 kcal).
For measured B1 Vitamini (Tiamin), Taze Biberiye has 0.036 mg and Araka has 0.266 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Taze Biberiye 76, Araka 62.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.