Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
14 kcal
Score
81 / 100
Aysberg marul has a higher nutrition quality score (81) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
25 vs 14(-44.0%)
Score Diff
60 vs 81(+35.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Aysberg marul
Higher energy
Tay patlıcanı
Score leader
Aysberg marul
Nutrient split
13 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tay patlıcanı and Aysberg marul are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tay patlıcanı has 25.0 kcal and Aysberg marul has 14.0 kcal. The difference is 11.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 60 and 81. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tay patlıcanı | Aysberg marul | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 25 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.04 mg | 0.041 mg | +2.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.037 mg | 0.025 mg | -32.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.084 mg | 0.042 mg | -50.0% |
| Bakir | 0.081 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 299 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.2 mg | 2.8 mg | +27.3% |
| Demir | 0.42 mg | 0.41 mg | -2.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 3 g | 1.2 g | -60.0% |
| Folat DFE | — | 29 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 20 mg | -16.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 3.5 µg | 24.1 µg | +588.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 15 mg | 18 mg | +20.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 5.7 g | 2.97 g | -47.9% |
| Kül | 0.58 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 14 mg | 7 mg | -50.0% |
| Mangan | 0.23 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.65 mg | 0.123 mg | -81.1% |
| Potasyum | 230 mg | 141 mg | -38.7% |
| Protein | 1.25 g | 0.9 g | -28.0% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 10 mg | +400.0% |
| Su | 91.5 g | 95.64 g | +4.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 22 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.18 g | 0.14 g | -22.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.4 g | 1.97 g | -17.9% |
| Çinko | 0.16 mg | 0.15 mg | -6.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tay patlıcanı and Aysberg marul.
Aysberg marul has less energy per 100 g (14 kcal versus 25 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Tay patlıcanı has 3.5 µg and Aysberg marul has 24.1 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tay patlıcanı 60, Aysberg marul 81.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.