Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
100 kcal
Score
32 / 100
Biber Tavuklu has a higher nutrition quality score (32) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
280 vs 100(-64.3%)
Score Diff
13 vs 32(+146.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Biber Tavuklu
Higher energy
Kiev Tavuk
Score leader
Biber Tavuklu
Nutrient split
42 - 14 (tie: 9)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kiev Tavuk and Biber Tavuklu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kiev Tavuk has 280.0 kcal and Biber Tavuklu has 100.0 kcal. The difference is 180.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 13 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kiev Tavuk | Biber Tavuklu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 83 µg | 16 µg | -80.7% |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 11 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.09 mg | 0.06 mg | -33.3% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.28 µg | 0.16 µg | -42.9% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | 0.12 mg | -42.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.24 mg | 0.38 mg | +58.3% |
| Bakir | 0.06 mg | 0.07 mg | +16.7% |
| Besin folati | 10 µg | 5 µg | -50.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 16 µg | 114 µg | +612.5% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 1 µg | 17 µg | +1600.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 5.9 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0.1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Demir | 0.66 mg | 0.67 mg | +1.5% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0.1 g | 0.5 g | +400.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.43 mg | 0.53 mg | +23.3% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 280 kj | 100 kj | -64.3% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 26 µg | 5 µg | -80.8% |
| Folik asit | 9 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Fosfor | 210 mg | 122 mg | -41.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.7 µg | 3.2 µg | +357.1% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 43 mg | 10 mg | -76.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 5.45 g | 2.41 g | -55.8% |
| Kolesterol | 106 mg | 61 mg | -42.5% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 2137 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | 21 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 24 mg | 18 mg | -25.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.54 g | 0.21 g | -61.1% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 6.16 g | 1.27 g | -79.4% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.1 g | 0.02 g | -80.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Niasin | 7.11 mg | 4.03 mg | -43.3% |
| Potasyum | 257 mg | 218 mg | -15.2% |
| Protein | 21.31 g | 14.11 g | -33.8% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 1.72 g | 0.7 g | -59.3% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.25 g | 0.04 g | -84.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.06 g | 0.04 g | -33.3% |
| Retinol | 81 µg | 5 µg | -93.8% |
| Selenyum | 26.4 µg | 14.5 µg | -45.1% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.2 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.22 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.79 g | 0.02 g | -97.5% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 4.03 g | 0.8 g | -80.1% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 1.52 g | 0.21 g | -86.2% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0.2 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 6:0 | 0.14 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.08 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Sodyum | 644 mg | 359 mg | -44.3% |
| Su | 51.6 g | 78.88 g | +52.9% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 7.42 g | 1.06 g | -85.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 19 µg | 5 µg | -73.7% |
| Toplam Kolin | 73.1 mg | 48.5 mg | -33.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.07 g | 1.51 g | -78.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 19.21 g | 3.71 g | -80.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.11 g | 0.82 g | -61.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.06 g | 1.37 g | +2183.3% |
| Çinko | 0.84 mg | 0.76 mg | -9.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kiev Tavuk and Biber Tavuklu.
Biber Tavuklu has less energy per 100 g (100 kcal versus 280 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Kiev Tavuk has 0.06 g and Biber Tavuklu has 1.37 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kiev Tavuk 13, Biber Tavuklu 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.