Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
141 kcal
Score
58 / 100
Tatlı su midyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (89) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
80 vs 141(+76.3%)
Score Diff
89 vs 58(-34.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tatlı su midyesi
Higher energy
Ala balığı
Score leader
Tatlı su midyesi
Nutrient split
9 - 6 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tatlı su midyesi and Ala balığı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tatlı su midyesi has 80.0 kcal and Ala balığı has 141.0 kcal. The difference is 61.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 89 and 58. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tatlı su midyesi | Ala balığı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 12 µg | 4.15 µg | -65.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.35 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.28 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 6 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 3.9 µg | — |
| Demir | 6.8 mg | 0.7 mg | -89.7% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0.52 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0.22 g | — |
| Fosfor | 184 mg | 245 mg | +33.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 92 mg | 67 mg | -27.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.1 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kolesterol | 50 mg | 59 mg | +18.0% |
| Kül | — | 1.22 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 34 mg | 25 mg | -26.5% |
| Niasin | 1.6 mg | 5.38 mg | +236.2% |
| Potasyum | 268 mg | 361 mg | +34.7% |
| Protein | 11.9 g | 19.94 g | +67.6% |
| Selenyum | 48.5 µg | 12.6 µg | -74.0% |
| Sodyum | 240 mg | 51 mg | -78.8% |
| Su | 81.2 g | 71.87 g | -11.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.39 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.03 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.8 g | 6.18 g | +243.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.73 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.9 mg | 0.66 mg | -65.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tatlı su midyesi and Ala balığı.
Tatlı su midyesi has less energy per 100 g (80 kcal versus 141 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Tatlı su midyesi has 1.8 g and Ala balığı has 6.18 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tatlı su midyesi 89, Ala balığı 58.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.