Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
324.2 kcal
Score
55 / 100
Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) has a higher nutrition quality score (95) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
295 vs 324.2(+9.9%)
Score Diff
95 vs 55(-42.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tarragon (Tarhun Otu)
Higher energy
Amchur
Score leader
Tarragon (Tarhun Otu)
Nutrient split
15 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) and Amchur are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) has 295.0 kcal and Amchur has 324.2 kcal. The difference is 29.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 95 and 55. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) | Amchur | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 4200 iu | — | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 210 µg | 22 µg | -89.5% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.251 mg | 0.08 mg | -68.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.339 mg | 0.09 mg | -93.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.41 mg | 0.22 mg | -90.9% |
| Bakir | — | 0.35 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 260 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 50 mg | 52 mg | +4.0% |
| Demir | 32.3 mg | 24.5 mg | -24.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 7.4 g | 12.8 g | +73.0% |
| Folat DFE | — | 28 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 313 mg | 75 mg | -76.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 1139 mg | 180 mg | -84.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 50.22 g | 80.2 g | +59.7% |
| Kül | 12.03 g | 5.3 g | -55.9% |
| Magnezyum | 347 mg | 82 mg | -76.4% |
| Mangan | 7.97 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 8.95 mg | 1.4 mg | -84.4% |
| Potasyum | 3020 mg | 640 mg | -78.8% |
| Protein | 22.77 g | 3.2 g | -85.9% |
| Sodyum | 62 mg | 35 mg | -43.5% |
| Su | 7.74 g | 9.5 g | +22.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 274 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 7.24 g | 1.8 g | -75.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 21.4 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.9 mg | 1.1 mg | -71.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) and Amchur.
Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) has less energy per 100 g (295 kcal versus 324.2 kcal).
For measured B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin), Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) has 1.339 mg and Amchur has 0.09 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tarragon (Tarhun Otu) 95, Amchur 55.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.