Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
304 kcal
Score
2 / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
150 vs 304(+102.7%)
Score Diff
— vs 2
Higher energy
Akasya Balı
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
2 - 14 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tagatoz and Akasya Balı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tagatoz has 150.0 kcal and Akasya Balı has 304.0 kcal. The difference is 154.0 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tagatoz | Akasya Balı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 0 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0 mg | 0.038 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0 mg | 0.024 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.036 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0.5 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0 mg | 0.42 mg | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0.2 g | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 2 µg | — |
| Fosfor | — | 4 mg | — |
| Fruktoz | — | 43.5 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 29.8 g | — |
| Kalsiyum | 0 mg | 6 mg | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 99.4 g | 82.4 g | -17.1% |
| Kül | 0.1 g | 0.2 g | +100.0% |
| Magnezyum | 0 mg | 2 mg | — |
| Maltoz | — | 2.1 g | — |
| Mangan | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0 mg | 0.12 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 0 mg | 52 mg | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.3 g | — |
| Sakkaroz | — | 1.9 g | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0.8 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 0 mg | 4 mg | — |
| Su | 0.5 g | 17.1 g | +3320.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 0 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 99.4 g | 82.1 g | -17.4% |
| Çinko | 0 mg | 0.22 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tagatoz and Akasya Balı.
Tagatoz has less energy per 100 g (150 kcal versus 304 kcal).
For measured Su, Tagatoz has 0.5 g and Akasya Balı has 17.1 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tagatoz —, Akasya Balı 2.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.