Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
405 kcal
Score
33 / 100
Sürk peyniri has a higher nutrition quality score (40) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
265 vs 405(+52.8%)
Score Diff
40 vs 33(-17.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Sürk peyniri
Higher energy
Appenzeller peyniri
Score leader
Sürk peyniri
Nutrient split
9 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Sürk peyniri and Appenzeller peyniri are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Sürk peyniri has 265.0 kcal and Appenzeller peyniri has 405.0 kcal. The difference is 140.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 40 and 33. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Sürk peyniri | Appenzeller peyniri | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 180 µg | 295 µg | +63.9% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.2 µg | 1.9 µg | +58.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.35 mg | 0.45 mg | +28.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.18 mg | 0.12 mg | -33.3% |
| Besin folati | 25 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.5 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | 0.6 µg | 0.7 µg | +16.7% |
| Demir | 2.5 mg | 0.3 mg | -88.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 3 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 265 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 450 mg | 540 mg | +20.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 650 mg | 780 mg | +20.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 0.1 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 4.5 g | — | — |
| Kolesterol | 55 mg | 105 mg | +90.9% |
| Kül | — | 4 g | — |
| Laktoz | 0.5 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 35 mg | 32 mg | -8.6% |
| Niasin | 2.5 mg | — | — |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.5 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 180 mg | 110 mg | -38.9% |
| Protein | 28 g | 25.5 g | -8.9% |
| Selenyum | 20 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 900 mg | 650 mg | -27.8% |
| Su | 40 g | 37.2 g | -7.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 10 g | 20.8 g | +108.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.5 g | 9.4 g | +108.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 16 g | 33.2 g | +107.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1 g | 1.1 g | +10.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1 g | 0.1 g | -90.0% |
| Çinko | 2.5 mg | 4.1 mg | +64.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Sürk peyniri and Appenzeller peyniri.
Sürk peyniri has less energy per 100 g (265 kcal versus 405 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Sürk peyniri has 4.5 g and Appenzeller peyniri has 9.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Sürk peyniri 40, Appenzeller peyniri 33.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.