Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
70 kcal
Score
40 / 100
Surinam kirazı has a higher nutrition quality score (41) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
33 vs 70(+112.1%)
Score Diff
41 vs 40(-2.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Surinam kirazı
Higher energy
Acai Berry
Score leader
Surinam kirazı
Nutrient split
4 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Surinam kirazı and Acai Berry are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Surinam kirazı has 33.0 kcal and Acai Berry has 70.0 kcal. The difference is 37.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 41 and 40. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
13 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Surinam kirazı | Acai Berry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 75 µg | 65 µg | -13.3% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 900 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 26 mg | 9 mg | -65.4% |
| Demir | 0.2 mg | 1.2 mg | +500.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.5 g | 3.5 g | +133.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.5 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 33 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 11 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 35 mg | +288.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 7.5 g | 4 g | -46.7% |
| Kül | 0.5 g | 0.8 g | +60.0% |
| Likopen | 1200 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 12 mg | 20 mg | +66.7% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 2.7 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.3 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 124 mg | 130 mg | +4.8% |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 1.2 g | +50.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 0.5 g | — |
| Sodyum | 3 mg | 7 mg | +133.3% |
| Su | 90.8 g | 85 g | -6.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.3 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.8 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 5 g | +1150.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.6 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.5 g | — |
| Çinko | — | 0.3 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Surinam kirazı and Acai Berry.
Surinam kirazı has less energy per 100 g (33 kcal versus 70 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Surinam kirazı has 0.4 g and Acai Berry has 5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Surinam kirazı 41, Acai Berry 40.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.