Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
282 kcal
Score
77 / 100
Aleppo biberi has a higher nutrition quality score (77) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
316 vs 282(-10.8%)
Score Diff
54 vs 77(+42.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Aleppo biberi
Higher energy
Sumak (Tane/Toz)
Score leader
Aleppo biberi
Nutrient split
3 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Sumak (Tane/Toz) and Aleppo biberi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Sumak (Tane/Toz) has 316.0 kcal and Aleppo biberi has 282.0 kcal. The difference is 34.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 54 and 77. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Sumak (Tane/Toz) | Aleppo biberi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 1480 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.16 mg | 0.3 mg | +87.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.24 mg | 0.9 mg | +275.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.19 mg | 2.1 mg | +1005.3% |
| Bakir | 0.42 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 17000 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 38.5 mg | 75 mg | +94.8% |
| Demir | 13.5 mg | 14.5 mg | +7.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 38 g | 27.2 g | -28.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 28 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 125 mg | 290 mg | +132.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 315 mg | 148 mg | -53.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 58.2 g | 52 g | -10.7% |
| Kül | 5 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 88 mg | 152 mg | +72.7% |
| Mangan | 1.85 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.75 mg | 8.7 mg | +397.1% |
| Potasyum | 860 mg | 1950 mg | +126.7% |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 12 g | +242.9% |
| Sodyum | 32 mg | 1600 mg | +4900.0% |
| Su | 9.5 g | 10.5 g | +10.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.85 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 18 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.25 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 7.8 g | 10 g | +28.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.15 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.1 g | 10.3 g | +390.5% |
| Çinko | 1.45 mg | 2.4 mg | +65.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Sumak (Tane/Toz) and Aleppo biberi.
Aleppo biberi has less energy per 100 g (282 kcal versus 316 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Sumak (Tane/Toz) has 32 mg and Aleppo biberi has 1600 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Sumak (Tane/Toz) 54, Aleppo biberi 77.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.