Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
118 kcal
Score
62 / 100
Biber has a higher nutrition quality score (62) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
152 vs 118(-22.4%)
Score Diff
61 vs 62(+1.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Biber
Higher energy
Dolu Yeşil Biber, Porto Riko usulü
Score leader
Biber
Nutrient split
30 - 16 (tie: 19)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Dolu Yeşil Biber, Porto Riko usulü and Biber are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Dolu Yeşil Biber, Porto Riko usulü has 152.0 kcal and Biber has 118.0 kcal. The difference is 34.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 61 and 62. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Dolu Yeşil Biber, Porto Riko usulü | Biber | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 17 µg | 12 µg | -29.4% |
| Alfa Karoten | 10 µg | 11 µg | +10.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.15 mg | 0.08 mg | -46.7% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.58 µg | 0.63 µg | +8.6% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.17 mg | 0.09 mg | -47.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.23 mg | 0.18 mg | -21.7% |
| Bakir | 0.13 mg | 0.14 mg | +7.7% |
| Besin folati | 16 µg | 50 µg | +212.5% |
| Beta Karoten | 186 µg | 114 µg | -38.7% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 4 µg | 17 µg | +325.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 45.7 mg | 6.3 mg | -86.2% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 1.86 mg | 1.91 mg | +2.7% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1.7 g | 3 g | +76.5% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.76 mg | 0.46 mg | -39.5% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 152 kj | 118 kj | -22.4% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 31 µg | 50 µg | +61.3% |
| Folik asit | 9 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Fosfor | 99 mg | 107 mg | +8.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 6.3 µg | 4.6 µg | -27.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 43 mg | 21 mg | -51.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 15.63 g | 10.25 g | -34.4% |
| Kolesterol | 22 mg | 22 mg | 0.0% |
| Likopen | 4551 µg | 2137 µg | -53.0% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 174 µg | 19 µg | -89.1% |
| Magnezyum | 23 mg | 25 mg | +8.7% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.17 g | 0.15 g | -11.8% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 2.04 g | 1.61 g | -21.1% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.02 g | 0.01 g | -50.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 2.92 mg | 1.75 mg | -40.1% |
| Potasyum | 315 mg | 285 mg | -9.5% |
| Protein | 8.89 g | 9.8 g | +10.2% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.47 g | 0.19 g | -59.6% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.05 g | 0.08 g | +60.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| Retinol | 1 µg | 1 µg | 0.0% |
| Selenyum | 9.2 µg | 6.6 µg | -28.3% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.14 g | 0.12 g | -14.3% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.18 g | 0.93 g | -21.2% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.68 g | 0.5 g | -26.5% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 732 mg | 340 mg | -53.6% |
| Su | 67.03 g | 74.06 g | +10.5% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.08 g | 1.62 g | -22.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 25 µg | 50 µg | +100.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | 25.9 mg | 34.3 mg | +32.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.27 g | 1.84 g | -18.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 5.84 g | 4.33 g | -25.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.53 g | 0.28 g | -47.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 3.48 g | 1.48 g | -57.5% |
| Çinko | 1.82 mg | 1.98 mg | +8.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Dolu Yeşil Biber, Porto Riko usulü and Biber.
Biber has less energy per 100 g (118 kcal versus 152 kcal).
For measured Beta kriptoksantin, Dolu Yeşil Biber, Porto Riko usulü has 4 µg and Biber has 17 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Dolu Yeşil Biber, Porto Riko usulü 61, Biber 62.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.