Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
368 kcal
Score
32 / 100
Soya unu has a higher nutrition quality score (50) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
441 vs 368(-16.6%)
Score Diff
50 vs 32(-36.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Soya unu
Higher energy
Soya unu
Score leader
Soya unu
Nutrient split
15 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Soya unu and Altın kinoa are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Soya unu has 441.0 kcal and Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal. The difference is 73.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 50 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Soya unu | Altın kinoa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.7 mg | 0.36 mg | -48.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.25 mg | 0.32 mg | +28.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.57 mg | 0.49 mg | -14.0% |
| Bakir | 2.4 mg | 0.59 mg | -75.4% |
| Demir | 6.4 mg | 4.57 mg | -28.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 9.6 g | 7 g | -27.1% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.44 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 368 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 305 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 589 mg | 457 mg | -22.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 210 mg | 47 mg | -77.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 31.9 g | 64.16 g | +101.1% |
| Kül | 4.9 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 429 mg | 197 mg | -54.1% |
| Mangan | 3 mg | 2 mg | -33.3% |
| Niasin | 2.6 mg | 1.52 mg | -41.5% |
| Potasyum | 2510 mg | 563 mg | -77.6% |
| Protein | 37.8 g | 14.12 g | -62.6% |
| Selenyum | — | 8.5 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 13 mg | 5 mg | -61.5% |
| Su | 5.3 g | 13.28 g | +150.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 184 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 20.6 g | 6.07 g | -70.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.1 g | — |
| Çinko | 3.9 mg | 3.1 mg | -20.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Soya unu and Altın kinoa.
Altın kinoa has less energy per 100 g (368 kcal versus 441 kcal).
For measured Su, Soya unu has 5.3 g and Altın kinoa has 13.28 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Soya unu 50, Altın kinoa 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.