Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
165 kcal
Score
26 / 100
Dana Sosu has a higher nutrition quality score (32) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
53 vs 165(+211.3%)
Score Diff
32 vs 26(-18.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Dana Sosu
Higher energy
Peynirli Ekmek
Score leader
Dana Sosu
Nutrient split
7 - 46 (tie: 12)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Dana Sosu and Peynirli Ekmek are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Dana Sosu has 53.0 kcal and Peynirli Ekmek has 165.0 kcal. The difference is 112.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 26. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Dana Sosu | Peynirli Ekmek | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1 µg | 149 µg | +14800.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | 0.06 mg | +100.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.1 µg | 0.38 µg | +280.0% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.21 mg | +425.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.01 mg | 0.05 mg | +400.0% |
| Bakir | 0.1 mg | 0.01 mg | -90.0% |
| Besin folati | 2 µg | 4 µg | +100.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | 34 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0.1 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 1.2 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.7 mg | 0.16 mg | -77.1% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0.4 g | 0.1 g | -75.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.02 mg | 0.61 mg | +2950.0% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 53 kj | 165 kj | +211.3% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 2 µg | 8 µg | +300.0% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 2 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 30 mg | 176 mg | +486.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 0.1 µg | 5.2 µg | +5100.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 6 mg | 241 mg | +3916.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.81 g | 6.32 g | +31.4% |
| Kolesterol | 3 mg | 26 mg | +766.7% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Magnezyum | 2 mg | 16 mg | +700.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.1 g | 0.13 g | +30.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.85 g | 3.7 g | +335.3% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | 0.02 g | +100.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.66 mg | 0.24 mg | -63.6% |
| Potasyum | 81 mg | 151 mg | +86.4% |
| Protein | 3.75 g | 7.5 g | +100.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.07 g | 1.38 g | +1871.4% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.01 g | 0.13 g | +1200.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| Retinol | 1 µg | 146 µg | +14500.0% |
| Selenyum | 1 µg | 7.3 µg | +630.0% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0.21 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.02 g | 0.24 g | +1100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.09 g | 0.76 g | +744.4% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.59 g | 2.57 g | +335.6% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.45 g | 1.12 g | +148.9% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0.16 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0.13 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0.09 g | — |
| Sodyum | 633 mg | 280 mg | -55.8% |
| Su | 87.48 g | 72.25 g | -17.4% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.15 g | 5.45 g | +373.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 2 µg | 7 µg | +250.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | 6.3 mg | 14.6 mg | +131.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.96 g | 3.71 g | +286.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 2.36 g | 12.26 g | +419.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.08 g | 1.49 g | +1762.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.21 g | 4.21 g | +1904.8% |
| Çinko | 1 mg | 1.08 mg | +8.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Dana Sosu and Peynirli Ekmek.
Dana Sosu has less energy per 100 g (53 kcal versus 165 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Dana Sosu has 1 µg and Peynirli Ekmek has 149 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Dana Sosu 32, Peynirli Ekmek 26.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.