Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Sichuan Biberi (Çin Biberi) has a higher nutrition quality score (62) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
284 vs 373(+31.3%)
Score Diff
62 vs 43(-30.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Sichuan Biberi (Çin Biberi)
Higher energy
Achiote
Score leader
Sichuan Biberi (Çin Biberi)
Nutrient split
9 - 10 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Sichuan Biberi (Çin Biberi) and Achiote are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Sichuan Biberi (Çin Biberi) has 284.0 kcal and Achiote has 373.0 kcal. The difference is 89.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 62 and 43. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Sichuan Biberi (Çin Biberi) | Achiote | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 15 µg | 100 µg | +566.7% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.15 mg | 0.25 mg | +66.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.25 mg | 0.4 mg | +60.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 0.35 mg | 0.0% |
| Bakir | 0.8 mg | 0.5 mg | -37.5% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 1200 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | 2 mg | -75.0% |
| Demir | 14.8 mg | 6.5 mg | -56.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 31.2 g | 16.5 g | -47.1% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.5 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 284 kcal | 373 kcal | +31.3% |
| Folat DFE | — | 120 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 260 mg | 250 mg | -3.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 950 mg | 355 mg | -62.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 45.3 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 60.3 g | — |
| Kül | 6.8 g | 6.48 g | -4.7% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 50 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 230 mg | 280 mg | +21.7% |
| Mangan | 4.5 mg | 1.5 mg | -66.7% |
| Niasin | 1.5 mg | 3 mg | +100.0% |
| Potasyum | 1250 mg | 1250 mg | 0.0% |
| Protein | 9.5 g | 12.86 g | +35.4% |
| Selenyum | — | 5 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 8 mg | 20 mg | +150.0% |
| Su | 9.2 g | 8 g | -13.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 7.2 g | 12.36 g | +71.7% |
| Çinko | 1.8 mg | 2.5 mg | +38.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Sichuan Biberi (Çin Biberi) and Achiote.
Sichuan Biberi (Çin Biberi) has less energy per 100 g (284 kcal versus 373 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Sichuan Biberi (Çin Biberi) has 15 µg and Achiote has 100 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Sichuan Biberi (Çin Biberi) 62, Achiote 43.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.