Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
32 kcal
Score
47 / 100
Yeşil papaya has a higher nutrition quality score (47) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
51 vs 32(-37.3%)
Score Diff
44 vs 47(+6.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yeşil papaya
Higher energy
Şekerpare kayısı
Score leader
Yeşil papaya
Nutrient split
14 - 4 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Şekerpare kayısı and Yeşil papaya are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Şekerpare kayısı has 51.0 kcal and Yeşil papaya has 32.0 kcal. The difference is 19.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 44 and 47. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Şekerpare kayısı | Yeşil papaya | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 96 µg | 24 µg | -75.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | 0.02 mg | -33.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.03 mg | -25.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 1094 µg | 274 µg | -75.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 10 mg | 60.9 mg | +509.0% |
| Demir | 0.39 mg | 0.25 mg | -35.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.1 g | 1.8 g | -14.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.89 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 9 µg | 38 µg | +322.2% |
| Fosfor | 23 mg | 5 mg | -78.3% |
| Fruktoz | 0.94 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 2.37 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 3.3 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 13 mg | 24 mg | +84.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 12.2 g | 8.8 g | -27.9% |
| Kül | 0.71 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 10 mg | 0.0% |
| Niasin | 0.6 mg | 0.35 mg | -41.7% |
| Potasyum | 259 mg | 180 mg | -30.5% |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 0.6 g | -57.1% |
| Sakkaroz | 5.87 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | — | 3 mg | — |
| Su | 85.3 g | 91.5 g | +7.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.39 g | 0.1 g | -74.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.24 g | 5 g | -45.9% |
| Çinko | 0.18 mg | 0.07 mg | -61.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Şekerpare kayısı and Yeşil papaya.
Yeşil papaya has less energy per 100 g (32 kcal versus 51 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Şekerpare kayısı has 10 mg and Yeşil papaya has 60.9 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Şekerpare kayısı 44, Yeşil papaya 47.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.