Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Schiff, Tiger'S Süt Bar has a higher nutrition quality score (68) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
387 vs 253(-34.6%)
Score Diff
68 vs 3(-95.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Schiff, Tiger'S Süt Bar
Higher energy
Schiff, Tiger'S Süt Bar
Score leader
Schiff, Tiger'S Süt Bar
Nutrient split
44 - 5 (tie: 21)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Schiff, Tiger'S Süt Bar and Ananas Sosu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Schiff, Tiger'S Süt Bar has 387.0 kcal and Ananas Sosu has 253.0 kcal. The difference is 134.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 68 and 3. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
70 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Schiff, Tiger'S Süt Bar | Ananas Sosu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 3 iu | 17 iu | +466.7% |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1 µg | 1 µg | 0.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Alfa tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Aspartik asit | 1.62 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 1.47 mg | 0.04 mg | -97.3% |
| B12 Vitamini | 4.2 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 4.2 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.32 mg | 0.02 mg | -93.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 1.68 mg | 0.03 mg | -98.2% |
| Bakir | 0.27 mg | 0.05 mg | -81.5% |
| Besin folati | 55 µg | 2 µg | -96.4% |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | 10 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Beta tokoferol | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| Beta tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Beta-sitosterol | 27 mg | — | — |
| Betain | 0.2 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 16.8 mg | 3.1 mg | -81.5% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | 0 iu | 0 iu | — |
| D3 Vitamini (kolekalsiferol) | 0 µg | — | — |
| Delta tokoferol | 0.17 mg | — | — |
| Delta tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 10.28 mg | 0.12 mg | -98.8% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 2.3 g | 0.4 g | -82.6% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.48 mg | 0.01 mg | -99.6% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 387 kj | 1059 kj | +173.6% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Florür | 0.4 µg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 55 µg | 2 µg | -96.4% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 560 mg | 3 mg | -99.5% |
| Gama tokoferol | 2.88 mg | — | — |
| Gama tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (dihidrofilokinon) | 0 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.6 µg | 0.2 µg | -95.7% |
| K Vitamini (menakinon-4) | 0 µg | — | — |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 429 mg | 6 mg | -98.6% |
| Kampesterol | 15 mg | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 56.46 g | 66.4 g | +17.6% |
| Kolesterol | 2 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Kül | 2.17 g | 0.4 g | -81.6% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 336 mg | 6 mg | -98.2% |
| Mangan | 0.94 mg | 0.07 mg | -92.6% |
| MUFA 14:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 15:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.02 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| MUFA 17:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 7.7 g | 0.03 g | -99.6% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.17 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| MUFA 24:1 c | 0 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 4.04 mg | 0.1 mg | -97.5% |
| Nisasta | 0.53 g | — | — |
| Pantotenik asit | 4.2 mg | 0.01 mg | -99.8% |
| Potasyum | 294 mg | 43 mg | -85.4% |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 0.1 g | -99.4% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 3.08 g | 0.05 g | -98.4% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.6 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:2 n-6 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 22:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Selenyum | 5.9 µg | 0.7 µg | -88.1% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.02 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 15:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.04 g | 0.02 g | -98.1% |
| SFA 17:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.47 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 20:0 | 0.15 g | — | — |
| SFA 22:0 | 0.27 g | — | — |
| SFA 24:0 | 0.11 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 168 mg | 42 mg | -75.0% |
| Stigmasterol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Su | 10.28 g | 33 g | +221.0% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.07 g | 0.02 g | -99.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 55 µg | 2 µg | -96.4% |
| Toplam Kolin | 42.3 mg | 1.6 mg | -96.2% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.91 g | 0.03 g | -99.6% |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | 0.04 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 14.29 g | 0.1 g | -99.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.68 g | 0.05 g | -98.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 36.4 g | 21.01 g | -42.3% |
| Çinko | 1.44 mg | 0.05 mg | -96.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Schiff, Tiger'S Süt Bar and Ananas Sosu.
Ananas Sosu has less energy per 100 g (253 kcal versus 387 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (IU), Schiff, Tiger'S Süt Bar has 3 iu and Ananas Sosu has 17 iu per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Schiff, Tiger'S Süt Bar 68, Ananas Sosu 3.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.