Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Sarımsaklı yoğurt sosu has a higher nutrition quality score (30) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
90.5 vs 263(+190.6%)
Score Diff
30 vs 6(-80.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Sarımsaklı yoğurt sosu
Higher energy
Ahududu reçeli
Score leader
Sarımsaklı yoğurt sosu
Nutrient split
10 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Sarımsaklı yoğurt sosu and Ahududu reçeli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Sarımsaklı yoğurt sosu has 90.5 kcal and Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal. The difference is 172.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 30 and 6. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
14 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Sarımsaklı yoğurt sosu | Ahududu reçeli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 45 µg | 2 µg | -95.6% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.35 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.14 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.06 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.2 mg | 8 mg | +566.7% |
| Demir | 0.15 mg | 0.4 mg | +166.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.2 g | 1.1 g | +450.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 263 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 5 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 90 mg | 9 mg | -90.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 110 mg | 15 mg | -86.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.5 g | 68 g | +1411.1% |
| Kolesterol | 12 mg | — | — |
| Kül | — | 0.3 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 12 mg | 6 mg | -50.0% |
| Mangan | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 150 mg | 77 mg | -48.7% |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 0.4 g | -88.6% |
| Sodyum | 350 mg | 12 mg | -96.6% |
| Su | 84.1 g | 30.2 g | -64.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.2 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.5 g | 0.1 g | -98.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 60.3 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.55 mg | 0.08 mg | -85.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Sarımsaklı yoğurt sosu and Ahududu reçeli.
Sarımsaklı yoğurt sosu has less energy per 100 g (90.5 kcal versus 263 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Sarımsaklı yoğurt sosu has 4.5 g and Ahududu reçeli has 68 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Sarımsaklı yoğurt sosu 30, Ahududu reçeli 6.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.