Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
69 kcal
Score
57 / 100
Abiyuch, Çiğ has a higher nutrition quality score (57) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
124 vs 69(-44.4%)
Score Diff
35 vs 57(+62.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Abiyuch, Çiğ
Higher energy
Sapote - Çiğ
Score leader
Abiyuch, Çiğ
Nutrient split
17 - 9 (tie: 5)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Sapote, Mamey, Çiğ and Abiyuch, Çiğ are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Sapote, Mamey, Çiğ has 124.0 kcal and Abiyuch, Çiğ has 69.0 kcal. The difference is 55.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 35 and 57. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
31 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Sapote - Çiğ | Abiyuch, Çiğ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 143 iu | 100 iu | -30.1% |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 7 µg | 5 µg | -28.6% |
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | 0.08 g | — | — |
| Alanin | 0.07 g | — | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Alfa tokotrienol | 0.36 mg | — | — |
| Arjinin | 0.05 g | — | — |
| Aspartik asit | 0.15 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.01 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.72 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.21 mg | 0.06 mg | -71.4% |
| Besin folati | 7 µg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 82 µg | 60 µg | -26.8% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 7 µg | — | — |
| Beta tokoferol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Beta tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 23 mg | 54.1 mg | +135.2% |
| Delta tokoferol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Delta tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.78 mg | 1.61 mg | +106.4% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 5.4 g | 5.3 g | -1.9% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.11 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 124 kj | 290 kj | +133.9% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Fenilalanin | 0.06 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 26 mg | 47 mg | +80.8% |
| Fruktoz | 7.66 g | 3.8 g | -50.4% |
| Galaktoz | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Gama tokoferol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Gama tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Glikoz | 8.01 g | 4.5 g | -43.8% |
| Glisin | 0.07 g | — | — |
| Glutamik asit | 0.15 g | — | — |
| Histidin | 0.05 g | — | — |
| Izolosin | 0.06 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 8 mg | -55.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 32.1 g | 17.6 g | -45.2% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1.12 g | 0.9 g | -19.6% |
| Laktoz | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Likopen | 199 µg | — | — |
| Lizin | 0.07 g | — | — |
| Losin | 0.07 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 204 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 11 mg | 24 mg | +118.2% |
| Maltoz | 0.38 g | 0.2 g | -47.4% |
| Mangan | 0.2 mg | 0.18 mg | -10.0% |
| Metiyonin | 0.02 g | — | — |
| MUFA 14:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 15:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 c | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 17:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.1 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 c | 0.1 g | — | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 c | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 24:1 c | 0 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.43 mg | — | — |
| Nisasta | 6.33 g | — | — |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.4 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 454 mg | 304 mg | -33.0% |
| Prolin | 0.09 g | — | — |
| Protein | 1.45 g | 1.5 g | +3.4% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.01 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:2 CLA | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:2 n-6 c,c | 0.01 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.08 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 n-6 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:2 n-6 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 n-3 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 n-6 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 22:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Sakkaroz | 4.09 g | 0.05 g | -98.8% |
| Serin | 0.2 g | — | — |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 15:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.1 g | — | — |
| SFA 17:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.02 g | — | — |
| SFA 20:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 22:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 24:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| Sistin | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 7 mg | 20 mg | +185.7% |
| Su | 64.87 g | 79.9 g | +23.2% |
| TFA 16:1 t | 0 g | — | — |
| TFA 18:1 t | 0 g | — | — |
| TFA 18:2 t (tanımsız) | 0 g | — | — |
| TFA 22:1 t | 0 g | — | — |
| Tirozin | 0.05 g | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.17 g | 0.01 g | -94.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 7 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.1 g | — | — |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Toplam trans-monoenoik yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam trans-poliinoik yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.46 g | 0.1 g | -78.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.1 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 20.14 g | 8.55 g | -57.5% |
| Treonin | 0.09 g | — | — |
| Triptofan | 0.05 g | — | — |
| Valin | 0.07 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.19 mg | 0.31 mg | +63.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Sapote, Mamey, Çiğ and Abiyuch, Çiğ.
Abiyuch, Çiğ has less energy per 100 g (69 kcal versus 124 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Sapote - Çiğ has 7 mg and Abiyuch, Çiğ has 20 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Sapote - Çiğ 35, Abiyuch, Çiğ 57.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.