Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
145 kcal
Score
58 / 100
Biber Biftek has a higher nutrition quality score (58) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
149 vs 145(-2.7%)
Score Diff
24 vs 58(+141.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Biber Biftek
Higher energy
Salisbury Biftek Soslu
Score leader
Biber Biftek
Nutrient split
23 - 22 (tie: 20)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Salisbury Biftek Soslu and Biber Biftek are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Salisbury Biftek Soslu has 149.0 kcal and Biber Biftek has 145.0 kcal. The difference is 4.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 24 and 58. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Salisbury Biftek Soslu | Biber Biftek | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | 9 µg | +350.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 7 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | 0.05 mg | -16.7% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.41 µg | 0.61 µg | +48.8% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | 0.08 mg | -33.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.13 mg | 0.26 mg | +100.0% |
| Bakir | 0.08 mg | 0.07 mg | -12.5% |
| Besin folati | 13 µg | 13 µg | 0.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | 101 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 2 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 22.6 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.95 mg | 1.24 mg | +30.5% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1 g | 0.7 g | -30.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0.01 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.23 mg | 1.43 mg | +521.7% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 149 kj | 145 kj | -2.7% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 13 µg | 13 µg | 0.0% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 127 mg | 89 mg | -29.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.7 µg | 19.5 µg | +1047.1% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 47 mg | 17 mg | -63.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6.78 g | 4.34 g | -36.0% |
| Kolesterol | 33 mg | 32 mg | -3.0% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | 173 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 17 mg | 16 mg | -5.9% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.39 g | 0.16 g | -59.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 4.22 g | 3.63 g | -14.0% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.09 g | 0.04 g | -55.6% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 1.32 mg | 2.26 mg | +71.2% |
| Potasyum | 144 mg | 202 mg | +40.3% |
| Protein | 6.98 g | 11.88 g | +70.2% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 1.33 g | 2.11 g | +58.6% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.06 g | 0.29 g | +383.3% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0.03 g | 0.01 g | -66.7% |
| Retinol | 2 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Selenyum | 7.5 µg | 11.6 µg | +54.7% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | 0.01 g | 0.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.19 g | 0.1 g | -47.4% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 2.49 g | 1.33 g | -46.6% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 1.17 g | 0.52 g | -55.6% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 509 mg | 244 mg | -52.1% |
| Su | 74.19 g | 73.55 g | -0.9% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.98 g | 2.01 g | -49.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 13 µg | 13 µg | 0.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | 15 mg | 46 mg | +206.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.8 g | 3.83 g | -20.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 10.47 g | 9.12 g | -12.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.48 g | 2.42 g | +63.5% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.26 g | 1.67 g | +542.3% |
| Çinko | 0.75 mg | 1.96 mg | +161.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Salisbury Biftek Soslu and Biber Biftek.
Biber Biftek has less energy per 100 g (145 kcal versus 149 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Salisbury Biftek Soslu has 1.7 µg and Biber Biftek has 19.5 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Salisbury Biftek Soslu 24, Biber Biftek 58.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.