Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
884 kcal
Score
— / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
119 vs 884(+642.9%)
Score Diff
9 vs —
Higher energy
Avokado Yağı
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
3 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Salata Sosu, Ranch Sos and Avokado Yağı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Salata Sosu, Ranch Sos has 119.0 kcal and Avokado Yağı has 884.0 kcal. The difference is 765.0 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
14 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Salata Sosu, Ranch Sos | Avokado Yağı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 3 iu | — | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1 µg | — | — |
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | 0.08 g | 0.95 g | +1087.5% |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.03 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.02 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.2 mg | — | — |
| Besin folati | 6 µg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 0 µg | — | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | — | — |
| Beta-sitosterol | — | 445 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.05 mg | — | — |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0.1 g | — | — |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.18 mg | 13 mg | +7122.2% |
| Enerji | 497 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 884 kcal | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | — | — |
| Fitosteroller | — | 478 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 6 µg | — | — |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 113 mg | — | — |
| Fruktoz | 0.42 g | — | — |
| Galaktoz | 0 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 1.91 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (dihidrofilokinon) | 0 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 2.3 µg | — | — |
| Kafein | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 50 mg | — | — |
| Kampesterol | — | 12 mg | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 26.51 g | — | — |
| Kolesterol | 7 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Kolin (fosfatidilkolin) | — | 0.2 mg | — |
| Kül | 3 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Laktoz | 0.07 g | — | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 4 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 8 mg | — | — |
| Maltoz | 1.38 g | — | — |
| Mangan | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.01 g | 4.96 g | +49500.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 c | 0.01 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.37 g | 67.9 g | +18251.4% |
| MUFA 18:1 c | 0.36 g | — | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 24:1 c | 0 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.01 mg | — | — |
| Nisasta | 4.99 g | — | — |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.77 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 111 mg | — | — |
| Protein | 0.25 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.62 g | 12.53 g | +1921.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 i | 0.01 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:2 n-6 c,c | 0.61 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.08 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 1 µg | — | — |
| Sakkaroz | 1.57 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | 0.8 µg | — | — |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.04 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.24 g | 11.24 g | +4583.3% |
| SFA 17:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.15 g | 0.32 g | +113.3% |
| SFA 20:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 22:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 24:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 897 mg | — | — |
| Stigmasterol | — | 2 mg | — |
| Su | 68.33 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | — | — |
| TFA 18:1 t | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.45 g | 11.56 g | +2468.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 6 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.39 g | 70.55 g | +17989.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.92 g | 100 g | +5108.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.7 g | 13.48 g | +1825.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.35 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.4 mg | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Salata Sosu, Ranch Sos and Avokado Yağı.
Salata Sosu, Ranch Sos has less energy per 100 g (119 kcal versus 884 kcal).
For measured MUFA 16:1, Salata Sosu, Ranch Sos has 0.01 g and Avokado Yağı has 4.96 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Salata Sosu, Ranch Sos 9, Avokado Yağı —.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.