Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Saf Akçaağaç Şurubu (Maple) has a higher nutrition quality score (9) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
260 vs 310(+19.2%)
Score Diff
9 vs 1(-88.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Saf Akçaağaç Şurubu (Maple)
Higher energy
Agave nektarı
Score leader
Saf Akçaağaç Şurubu (Maple)
Nutrient split
11 - 7 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Saf Akçaağaç Şurubu (Maple) and Agave nektarı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Saf Akçaağaç Şurubu (Maple) has 260.0 kcal and Agave nektarı has 310.0 kcal. The difference is 50.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 9 and 1. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Saf Akçaağaç Şurubu (Maple) | Agave nektarı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.006 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.27 mg | 0.015 mg | -98.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.014 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.07 mg | 0.033 mg | -52.9% |
| Demir | 0.11 mg | 0.11 mg | 0.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0.2 g | — |
| Enerji | 1088 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 260 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 1 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 2 mg | 1 mg | -50.0% |
| Fruktoz | 1 g | 55.6 g | +5460.0% |
| Glikoz | 1 g | 12.43 g | +1143.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 102 mg | 1 mg | -99.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 67.04 g | 76.37 g | +13.9% |
| Kül | 0.46 g | 0.14 g | -69.6% |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 1 mg | -95.2% |
| Mangan | 2.91 mg | 0.041 mg | -98.6% |
| Potasyum | 212 mg | 4 mg | -98.1% |
| Protein | 0.04 g | 0.09 g | +125.0% |
| Sakkaroz | 58 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0.7 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 4 mg | -66.7% |
| Su | 32.4 g | 22.95 g | -29.2% |
| Toplam Kolin | 1.6 mg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.06 g | 0.45 g | +650.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 60.46 g | 68.03 g | +12.5% |
| Çinko | 1.47 mg | 0.09 mg | -93.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Saf Akçaağaç Şurubu (Maple) and Agave nektarı.
Saf Akçaağaç Şurubu (Maple) has less energy per 100 g (260 kcal versus 310 kcal).
For measured Fruktoz, Saf Akçaağaç Şurubu (Maple) has 1 g and Agave nektarı has 55.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Saf Akçaağaç Şurubu (Maple) 9, Agave nektarı 1.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.