Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
81 kcal
Score
67 / 100
Razor clam has a higher nutrition quality score (97) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
78 vs 81(+3.9%)
Score Diff
97 vs 67(-30.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Razor clam
Higher energy
Alaska pollock
Score leader
Razor clam
Nutrient split
10 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Razor clam and Alaska pollock are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Razor clam has 78.0 kcal and Alaska pollock has 81.0 kcal. The difference is 3.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 97 and 67. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Razor clam | Alaska pollock | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.046 mg | -8.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 49 µg | 3.1 µg | -93.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | 0.106 mg | -47.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.3 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 12 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Demir | 13.9 mg | 0.24 mg | -98.3% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0.2 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | — | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0.12 g | — |
| Fosfor | 169 mg | 184 mg | +8.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 46 mg | 10 mg | -78.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.4 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kolesterol | 40 mg | 71 mg | +77.5% |
| Kül | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 42 mg | 67 mg | +59.5% |
| Niasin | 1.5 mg | 1.32 mg | -12.0% |
| Potasyum | 310 mg | 356 mg | +14.8% |
| Protein | 14.5 g | 17.18 g | +18.5% |
| Selenyum | 45.2 µg | 36.5 µg | -19.2% |
| Sodyum | 505 mg | 99 mg | -80.4% |
| Su | 79.2 g | 81.18 g | +2.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.1 g | 0.14 g | +40.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.12 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.7 g | 0.8 g | +14.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.34 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.6 mg | 0.46 mg | -71.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Razor clam and Alaska pollock.
Razor clam has less energy per 100 g (78 kcal versus 81 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Razor clam has 3.4 g and Alaska pollock has 0 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Razor clam 97, Alaska pollock 67.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.