Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
81 kcal
Score
62 / 100
Raponza has a higher nutrition quality score (99) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
21 vs 81(+285.7%)
Score Diff
99 vs 62(-37.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Raponza
Higher energy
Araka
Score leader
Raponza
Nutrient split
8 - 10 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Raponza and Araka are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Raponza has 21.0 kcal and Araka has 81.0 kcal. The difference is 60.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 99 and 62. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Raponza | Araka | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 350 µg | 38 µg | -89.1% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.07 mg | 0.266 mg | +280.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | 0.132 mg | +65.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.25 mg | 0.169 mg | -32.4% |
| Beta Karoten | 4200 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 38 mg | 40 mg | +5.3% |
| Demir | 2.2 mg | 1.47 mg | -33.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.8 g | 5.7 g | +216.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.13 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 42 mg | 108 mg | +157.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 180 µg | 24.8 µg | -86.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 70 mg | 25 mg | -64.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 2.1 g | 14.45 g | +588.1% |
| Kül | 0.9 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 13 mg | 33 mg | +153.8% |
| Niasin | — | 2.09 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 460 mg | 244 mg | -47.0% |
| Protein | 2 g | 5.42 g | +171.0% |
| Sodyum | 10 mg | 5 mg | -50.0% |
| Su | 92.8 g | 78.86 g | -15.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 65 µg | 65 µg | 0.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.4 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.8 g | 5.67 g | +608.8% |
| Çinko | 0.5 mg | 1.24 mg | +148.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Raponza and Araka.
Raponza has less energy per 100 g (21 kcal versus 81 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Raponza has 0.8 g and Araka has 5.67 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Raponza 99, Araka 62.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Raponza · Araka · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.