Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
27 kcal
Score
68 / 100
Raponza has a higher nutrition quality score (99) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
21 vs 27(+28.6%)
Score Diff
99 vs 68(-31.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Raponza
Higher energy
Alabaş (Kohlrabi)
Score leader
Raponza
Nutrient split
11 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Raponza and Alabaş (Kohlrabi) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Raponza has 21.0 kcal and Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 27.0 kcal. The difference is 6.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 99 and 68. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Raponza | Alabaş (Kohlrabi) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 350 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.07 mg | 0.05 mg | -28.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | 0.02 mg | -75.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.25 mg | 0.15 mg | -40.0% |
| Bakir | — | 0.129 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 4200 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 38 mg | 62 mg | +63.2% |
| Demir | 2.2 mg | 0.4 mg | -81.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | +100.0% |
| Fosfor | 42 mg | 46 mg | +9.5% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 180 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 70 mg | 24 mg | -65.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 2.1 g | 6.2 g | +195.2% |
| Kül | 0.9 g | 1 g | +11.1% |
| Magnezyum | 13 mg | 19 mg | +46.2% |
| Mangan | — | 0.139 mg | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.4 mg | — |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.165 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 460 mg | 350 mg | -23.9% |
| Protein | 2 g | 1.7 g | -15.0% |
| Sodyum | 10 mg | 20 mg | +100.0% |
| Su | 92.8 g | 91 g | -1.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.013 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 65 µg | 16 µg | -75.4% |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 12.3 mg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.4 g | 0.1 g | -75.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.8 g | 2.6 g | +225.0% |
| Çinko | 0.5 mg | 0.03 mg | -94.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Raponza and Alabaş (Kohlrabi).
Raponza has less energy per 100 g (21 kcal versus 27 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Raponza has 0.8 g and Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 2.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Raponza 99, Alabaş (Kohlrabi) 68.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.