Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
884 kcal
Score
— / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
160 vs 884(+452.5%)
Score Diff
2 vs —
Higher energy
Bademli Yağ
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
35 - 12 (tie: 18)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ranch Sosu, Hafif and Bademli Yağ are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ranch Sosu, Hafif has 160.0 kcal and Bademli Yağ has 884.0 kcal. The difference is 724.0 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ranch Sosu, Hafif | Bademli Yağ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 11 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 17 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.01 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.07 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.01 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.03 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Bakir | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Besin folati | 6 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 64 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.4 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.13 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.45 mg | 39.2 mg | +1500.0% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 160 kj | 884 kj | +452.5% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 6 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 7 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 3.5 µg | 7 µg | +100.0% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 6 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 7 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | 5 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 78 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Magnezyum | 2 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.03 g | 0.6 g | +1900.0% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 3.2 g | 69.4 g | +2068.8% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.03 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.02 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Potasyum | 36 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 7.04 g | 17.4 g | +147.2% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.94 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | 5 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Selenyum | 1.6 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.04 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.48 g | 6.5 g | +339.2% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.55 g | 1.7 g | +209.1% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0.01 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 833 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Su | 74 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.12 g | 8.2 g | +286.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 6 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | 16 mg | 0.4 mg | -97.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.27 g | 69.9 g | +2037.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 14 g | 100 g | +614.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.99 g | 17.4 g | +117.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 5.65 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Çinko | 0.04 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ranch Sosu, Hafif and Bademli Yağ.
Ranch Sosu, Hafif has less energy per 100 g (160 kcal versus 884 kcal).
For measured MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit), Ranch Sosu, Hafif has 3.2 g and Bademli Yağ has 69.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ranch Sosu, Hafif 2, Bademli Yağ —.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.