Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
337 kcal
Score
66 / 100
Pul biber has a higher nutrition quality score (68) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
318 vs 337(+6.0%)
Score Diff
68 vs 66(-2.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Pul biber
Higher energy
Anason Tohumu
Score leader
Pul biber
Nutrient split
10 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Pul biber and Anason Tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Pul biber has 318.0 kcal and Anason Tohumu has 337.0 kcal. The difference is 19.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 68 and 66. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Pul biber | Anason Tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2081 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.33 mg | 0.34 mg | +3.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.92 mg | 0.29 mg | -68.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.1 mg | 0.65 mg | -69.0% |
| Bakir | 0.37 mg | 0.91 mg | +145.9% |
| Beta Karoten | 21840 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 76.4 mg | 21 mg | -72.5% |
| Demir | 7.8 mg | 36.96 mg | +373.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 27.2 g | 14.6 g | -46.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 29.8 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | — | 440 mg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 80.3 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 148 mg | 646 mg | +336.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 56.63 g | 50.02 g | -11.7% |
| Kül | — | 7.04 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 152 mg | 170 mg | +11.8% |
| Mangan | 2 mg | 2.3 mg | +15.0% |
| Niasin | 8.7 mg | 3.06 mg | -64.8% |
| Potasyum | 2014 mg | 1441 mg | -28.5% |
| Protein | 12.01 g | 17.6 g | +46.5% |
| Sodyum | 30 mg | 16 mg | -46.7% |
| Su | 10.4 g | 9.54 g | -8.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.59 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 10 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 9.78 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 17.27 g | 15.9 g | -7.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 3.15 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.48 mg | 5.3 mg | +113.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Pul biber and Anason Tohumu.
Pul biber has less energy per 100 g (318 kcal versus 337 kcal).
For measured Demir, Pul biber has 7.8 mg and Anason Tohumu has 36.96 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Pul biber 68, Anason Tohumu 66.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.