Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
368 kcal
Score
32 / 100
Altın kinoa has a higher nutrition quality score (32) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
387 vs 368(-4.9%)
Score Diff
6 vs 32(+433.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Altın kinoa
Higher energy
Pirinç patlağı
Score leader
Altın kinoa
Nutrient split
3 - 17 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Pirinç patlağı and Altın kinoa are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Pirinç patlağı has 387.0 kcal and Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal. The difference is 19.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 6 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Pirinç patlağı | Altın kinoa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.36 mg | +350.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.03 mg | 0.32 mg | +966.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.1 mg | 0.49 mg | +390.0% |
| Bakir | 0.1 mg | 0.59 mg | +490.0% |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 4.57 mg | +1042.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.7 g | 7 g | +311.8% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.44 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 368 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 115 mg | 457 mg | +297.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 5 mg | 47 mg | +840.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 81.5 g | 64.16 g | -21.3% |
| Kül | 1 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 30 mg | 197 mg | +556.7% |
| Mangan | 0.8 mg | 2 mg | +150.0% |
| Niasin | 4.1 mg | 1.52 mg | -62.9% |
| Potasyum | 115 mg | 563 mg | +389.6% |
| Protein | 8.2 g | 14.12 g | +72.2% |
| Selenyum | 16 µg | 8.5 µg | -46.9% |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 5 mg | +25.0% |
| Su | 4.5 g | 13.28 g | +195.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 4 µg | 184 µg | +4500.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.3 g | 6.07 g | +366.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.1 g | — |
| Çinko | 1 mg | 3.1 mg | +210.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Pirinç patlağı and Altın kinoa.
Altın kinoa has less energy per 100 g (368 kcal versus 387 kcal).
For measured Toplam Folat, Pirinç patlağı has 4 µg and Altın kinoa has 184 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Pirinç patlağı 6, Altın kinoa 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.