Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Pirinç patlağı gevreği has a higher nutrition quality score (83) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
385 vs 371(-3.6%)
Score Diff
83 vs 41(-50.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Pirinç patlağı gevreği
Higher energy
Pirinç patlağı gevreği
Score leader
Pirinç patlağı gevreği
Nutrient split
11 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Pirinç patlağı gevreği and Amarant Tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Pirinç patlağı gevreği has 385.0 kcal and Amarant Tohumu has 371.0 kcal. The difference is 14.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 83 and 41. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Pirinç patlağı gevreği | Amarant Tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 750 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 1.5 mg | 0.12 mg | -92.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 6 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.7 mg | 0.2 mg | -88.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2 mg | 0.59 mg | -70.5% |
| Bakir | — | 0.53 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 60 mg | 4.2 mg | -93.0% |
| D Vitamini (IU) | 333 iu | — | — |
| Demir | 28 mg | 7.61 mg | -72.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.5 g | 6.7 g | +346.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.19 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 667 µg | 82 µg | -87.7% |
| Fosfor | — | 557 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 5 mg | 159 mg | +3080.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 89 g | 65.25 g | -26.7% |
| Kül | 1.6 g | 2.88 g | +80.0% |
| Lizin | — | 0.75 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 248 mg | +892.0% |
| Mangan | — | 3.33 mg | — |
| Niasin | 20 mg | 0.92 mg | -95.4% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 1.46 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 110 mg | 508 mg | +361.8% |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 13.56 g | +115.2% |
| Selenyum | — | 18.7 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 520 mg | 4 mg | -99.2% |
| Su | 2 g | 11.29 g | +464.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.46 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.69 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.1 g | 7.02 g | +538.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.78 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.2 g | 1.69 g | -81.6% |
| Çinko | 15 mg | 2.87 mg | -80.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Pirinç patlağı gevreği and Amarant Tohumu.
Amarant Tohumu has less energy per 100 g (371 kcal versus 385 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Pirinç patlağı gevreği has 5 mg and Amarant Tohumu has 159 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Pirinç patlağı gevreği 83, Amarant Tohumu 41.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.