Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Perga (Arı Ekmeği) has a higher nutrition quality score (43) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
312 vs 263(-15.7%)
Score Diff
43 vs 6(-86.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Perga (Arı Ekmeği)
Higher energy
Perga (Arı Ekmeği)
Score leader
Perga (Arı Ekmeği)
Nutrient split
12 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Perga (Arı Ekmeği) and Ahududu reçeli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Perga (Arı Ekmeği) has 312.0 kcal and Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal. The difference is 49.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 43 and 6. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Perga (Arı Ekmeği) | Ahududu reçeli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 2 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.75 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 1.15 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.62 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 780 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 17.5 mg | 8 mg | -54.3% |
| Demir | 7.4 mg | 0.4 mg | -94.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 9.5 g | 1.1 g | -88.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 8.2 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 263 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 5 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 375 mg | 9 mg | -97.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 185 mg | 15 mg | -91.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 42 g | 68 g | +61.9% |
| Kül | 2.8 g | 0.3 g | -89.3% |
| Magnezyum | 88 mg | 6 mg | -93.2% |
| Mangan | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| Niasin | 4.8 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 560 mg | 77 mg | -86.3% |
| Protein | 21 g | 0.4 g | -98.1% |
| Sodyum | 24 mg | 12 mg | -50.0% |
| Su | 18.2 g | 30.2 g | +65.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 210 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5.5 g | 0.1 g | -98.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 28.5 g | 60.3 g | +111.6% |
| Çinko | 3.6 mg | 0.08 mg | -97.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Perga (Arı Ekmeği) and Ahududu reçeli.
Ahududu reçeli has less energy per 100 g (263 kcal versus 312 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Perga (Arı Ekmeği) has 28.5 g and Ahududu reçeli has 60.3 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Perga (Arı Ekmeği) 43, Ahududu reçeli 6.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.