Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Makarna, Tam Buğday, Kuru has a higher nutrition quality score (26) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
352 vs 357.2(+1.5%)
Score Diff
26 vs 20(-23.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Makarna - Tam Buğday
Higher energy
Arpa Unu
Score leader
Makarna - Tam Buğday
Nutrient split
15 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Makarna, Tam Buğday, Kuru and Arpa Unu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Makarna, Tam Buğday, Kuru has 352.0 kcal and Arpa Unu has 357.2 kcal. The difference is 5.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 26 and 20. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Makarna - Tam Buğday | Arpa Unu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | 0.07 g | — | — |
| Alfa tokotrienol | 0.4 mg | — | — |
| Azot | — | 1.5 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.41 mg | 0.23 mg | -43.9% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.22 mg | 0.15 mg | -31.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.28 mg | 0.2 mg | -28.6% |
| Bakir | 0.5 mg | 0.39 mg | -22.0% |
| Besin folati | 69 µg | — | — |
| Beta tokoferol | 0.22 mg | — | — |
| Beta tokotrienol | 2.79 mg | — | — |
| Beta-glukan | — | 4.2 g | — |
| Biyotin | — | 8.61 µg | — |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | 0 iu | — | — |
| Delta tokoferol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Delta tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 3.62 mg | 3.3 mg | -8.8% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 9.2 g | 12.79 g | +39.0% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Düşük molekül ağırlıklı diyet lifi | — | 2.31 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.46 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 1471 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 366.53 kcal | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | — | 357.19 kcal | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 69 µg | — | — |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 343 mg | 234.4 mg | -31.7% |
| Fruktoz | 0.3 g | — | — |
| Galaktoz | 0 g | — | — |
| Gama tokoferol | 0.87 mg | — | — |
| Gama tokotrienol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Glikoz | 0.24 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (dihidrofilokinon) | 0 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.4 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (menakinon-4) | 0 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 29 mg | 35.56 mg | +22.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 73.37 g | 77.4 g | +5.5% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1.62 g | 1.53 g | -5.6% |
| Laktoz | 0 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 128 mg | 88.04 mg | -31.2% |
| Maltoz | 1.52 g | — | — |
| Mangan | 2.98 mg | 1.18 mg | -60.4% |
| Molibden | — | 57.36 µg | — |
| MUFA 14:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 15:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 c | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 17:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 0.34 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 c | 0.34 g | — | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 c | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 24:1 c | 0 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 8.69 mg | 5.94 mg | -31.6% |
| Nisasta | 56.75 g | 56.86 g | +0.2% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.87 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 434 mg | 366.6 mg | -15.5% |
| Protein | 13.87 g | 8.72 g | -37.1% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 1.06 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:2 CLA | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:2 n-6 c,c | 1.06 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.07 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 n-6 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3i | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:2 n-6 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 n-3 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 n-6 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 22:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | — | — |
| Sakkaroz | 0.68 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | 77.6 µg | 13.1 µg | -83.1% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 15:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.37 g | — | — |
| SFA 17:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.03 g | — | — |
| SFA 20:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 22:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 24:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 6 mg | 20.33 mg | +238.8% |
| Su | 8.21 g | 9.9 g | +20.6% |
| TFA 16:1 t | 0 g | — | — |
| TFA 18:1 t | 0 g | — | — |
| TFA 18:2 t (tanımsız) | 0 g | — | — |
| TFA 22:1 t | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.43 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 69 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.36 g | — | — |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam trans-monoenoik yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam trans-poliinoik yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 2.93 g | 2.45 g | -16.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.14 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.74 g | — | — |
| Total dietary fiber (AOAC 2011.25) | — | 16.15 g | — |
| Yüksek molekül ağırlıklı diyet lifi | — | 13.83 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.97 mg | 2.14 mg | -27.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Makarna, Tam Buğday, Kuru and Arpa Unu.
Makarna - Tam Buğday has less energy per 100 g (352 kcal versus 357.2 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Makarna - Tam Buğday has 6 mg and Arpa Unu has 20.33 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Makarna - Tam Buğday 26, Arpa Unu 20.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.