Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
282 kcal
Score
71 / 100
Papatya Tozu has a higher nutrition quality score (78) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
241 vs 282(+17.0%)
Score Diff
78 vs 71(-9.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Papatya Tozu
Higher energy
Acı paprika
Score leader
Papatya Tozu
Nutrient split
8 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Papatya Tozu and Acı paprika are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Papatya Tozu has 241.0 kcal and Acı paprika has 282.0 kcal. The difference is 41.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 78 and 71. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Papatya Tozu | Acı paprika | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 2463 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.15 mg | 0.33 mg | +120.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.4 mg | 1.23 mg | +207.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.45 mg | 2.09 mg | +364.4% |
| Bakir | 1.1 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 350 µg | 26162 µg | +7374.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 18 mg | 0.9 mg | -95.0% |
| Demir | 22.5 mg | 21.14 mg | -6.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 41.2 g | 34.8 g | -15.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 29.1 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 190 mg | 314 mg | +65.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 80.3 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 750 mg | 177 mg | -76.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 67.8 g | 53.99 g | -20.4% |
| Kül | 8 g | 7.8 g | -2.5% |
| Magnezyum | 240 mg | 178 mg | -25.8% |
| Mangan | 4.5 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.2 mg | 10.06 mg | +738.3% |
| Potasyum | 1600 mg | 2280 mg | +42.5% |
| Protein | 9.6 g | 14.14 g | +47.3% |
| Sodyum | 78 mg | 30 mg | -61.5% |
| Su | 8 g | 8.05 g | +0.6% |
| Toplam Folat | 120 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 3.4 g | 12.89 g | +279.1% |
| Çinko | 3.2 mg | 4.33 mg | +35.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Papatya Tozu and Acı paprika.
Papatya Tozu has less energy per 100 g (241 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured Beta Karoten, Papatya Tozu has 350 µg and Acı paprika has 26162 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Papatya Tozu 78, Acı paprika 71.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.