Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
210 kcal
Score
13 / 100
Pankek, Tam Tane has a higher nutrition quality score (25) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
273 vs 210(-23.1%)
Score Diff
25 vs 13(-48.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Pankek, Tam Tane
Higher energy
Pankek, Tam Tane
Score leader
Pankek, Tam Tane
Nutrient split
43 - 9 (tie: 13)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Pankek, Tam Tane and Dosa, Sade are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Pankek, Tam Tane has 273.0 kcal and Dosa, Sade has 210.0 kcal. The difference is 63.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 25 and 13. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
65 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Pankek, Tam Tane | Dosa, Sade | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 79 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.17 mg | 0.23 mg | +35.3% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.4 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.46 mg | 0.04 mg | -91.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.11 mg | 0.1 mg | -9.1% |
| Bakir | 0.12 mg | 0.15 mg | +25.0% |
| Besin folati | 16 µg | 35 µg | +118.8% |
| Beta Karoten | 13 µg | 2 µg | -84.6% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 2 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0 mg | 0.3 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Demir | 3.15 mg | 2.19 mg | -30.5% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 3.2 g | 1.8 g | -43.8% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.82 mg | 0.8 mg | -56.0% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 273 kj | 210 kj | -23.1% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 44 µg | 132 µg | +200.0% |
| Folik asit | 17 µg | 57 µg | +235.3% |
| Fosfor | 403 mg | 72 mg | -82.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 8.9 µg | 4.4 µg | -50.6% |
| Kafein | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 138 mg | 16 mg | -88.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 32.9 g | 37.04 g | +12.6% |
| Kolesterol | 69 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 113 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Magnezyum | 42 mg | 14 mg | -66.7% |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.09 g | 0.01 g | -88.9% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 4.18 g | 1.61 g | -61.5% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.05 g | 0.03 g | -40.0% |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 2.96 mg | 1.74 mg | -41.2% |
| Potasyum | 252 mg | 104 mg | -58.7% |
| Protein | 7.86 g | 5.7 g | -27.5% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 3.04 g | 1.35 g | -55.6% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.35 g | 0.19 g | -45.7% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | 78 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Selenyum | 13.3 µg | 5.6 µg | -57.9% |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.06 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.07 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.24 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 1.76 g | 0.43 g | -75.6% |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.62 g | 0.11 g | -82.3% |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0.06 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 6:0 | 0.04 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.03 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Sodyum | 722 mg | 309 mg | -57.2% |
| Su | 44.93 g | 51.8 g | +15.3% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3 g | 0.58 g | -80.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 32 µg | 92 µg | +187.5% |
| Toplam Kolin | 55.7 mg | 14.3 mg | -74.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.33 g | 1.66 g | -61.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 12.29 g | 4.05 g | -67.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.44 g | 1.54 g | -55.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 6.89 g | 0.3 g | -95.6% |
| Çinko | 1.08 mg | 0.75 mg | -30.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Pankek, Tam Tane and Dosa, Sade.
Dosa, Sade has less energy per 100 g (210 kcal versus 273 kcal).
For measured Folik asit, Pankek, Tam Tane has 17 µg and Dosa, Sade has 57 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Pankek, Tam Tane 25, Dosa, Sade 13.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.