Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
27 kcal
Score
68 / 100
Nopal kaktüsü has a higher nutrition quality score (95) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
16 vs 27(+68.8%)
Score Diff
95 vs 68(-28.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Nopal kaktüsü
Higher energy
Alabaş (Kohlrabi)
Score leader
Nopal kaktüsü
Nutrient split
10 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Nopal kaktüsü and Alabaş (Kohlrabi) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Nopal kaktüsü has 16.0 kcal and Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 27.0 kcal. The difference is 11.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 95 and 68. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Nopal kaktüsü | Alabaş (Kohlrabi) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 23 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.014 mg | 0.05 mg | +257.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.041 mg | 0.02 mg | -51.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.07 mg | 0.15 mg | +114.3% |
| Bakir | 0.05 mg | 0.129 mg | +158.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 250 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 9.3 mg | 62 mg | +566.7% |
| Demir | 0.59 mg | 0.4 mg | -32.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.2 g | 3.6 g | +63.6% |
| Fosfor | 16 mg | 46 mg | +187.5% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 5.3 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 164 mg | 24 mg | -85.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 3.33 g | 6.2 g | +86.2% |
| Kül | 1.14 g | 1 g | -12.3% |
| Magnezyum | 52 mg | 19 mg | -63.5% |
| Mangan | 0.46 mg | 0.139 mg | -69.8% |
| Niasin | 0.41 mg | 0.4 mg | -2.4% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.165 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 257 mg | 350 mg | +36.2% |
| Protein | 1.32 g | 1.7 g | +28.8% |
| Sodyum | 21 mg | 20 mg | -4.8% |
| Su | 94.12 g | 91 g | -3.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.013 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 3 µg | 16 µg | +433.3% |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 12.3 mg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.09 g | 0.1 g | +11.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.15 g | 2.6 g | +126.1% |
| Çinko | 0.2 mg | 0.03 mg | -85.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Nopal kaktüsü and Alabaş (Kohlrabi).
Nopal kaktüsü has less energy per 100 g (16 kcal versus 27 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Nopal kaktüsü has 9.3 mg and Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 62 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Nopal kaktüsü 95, Alabaş (Kohlrabi) 68.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.