Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
357 kcal
Score
1 / 100
Nohut Unu has a higher nutrition quality score (30) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
387 vs 357(-7.8%)
Score Diff
30 vs 1(-96.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Nohut Unu
Higher energy
Nohut Unu
Score leader
Nohut Unu
Nutrient split
19 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Nohut Unu and Ararot nişastası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Nohut Unu has 387.0 kcal and Ararot nişastası has 357.0 kcal. The difference is 30.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 30 and 1. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Nohut Unu | Ararot nişastası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.49 mg | 0.013 mg | -97.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | 0.005 mg | -95.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.52 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.84 mg | 0.121 mg | -85.6% |
| Demir | 4.86 mg | 0.33 mg | -93.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 10.8 g | 3.4 g | -68.5% |
| Fosfor | 318 mg | 5 mg | -98.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 45 mg | 40 mg | -11.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 57.82 g | 88.15 g | +52.5% |
| Kül | — | 0.14 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 166 mg | 3 mg | -98.2% |
| Mangan | 1.6 mg | 0.116 mg | -92.8% |
| Niasin | 1.76 mg | 0.082 mg | -95.3% |
| Nisasta | — | 84.75 g | — |
| Potasyum | 846 mg | 11 mg | -98.7% |
| Protein | 22.39 g | 0.32 g | -98.6% |
| Selenyum | 8.3 µg | 0.7 µg | -91.6% |
| Sodyum | 64 mg | 21 mg | -67.2% |
| Su | 10.28 g | 11.32 g | +10.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.69 g | 0.015 g | -97.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 437 µg | 7 µg | -98.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.39 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.69 g | 0.07 g | -99.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.73 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 10.85 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Çinko | 2.81 mg | 0.06 mg | -97.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Nohut Unu and Ararot nişastası.
Ararot nişastası has less energy per 100 g (357 kcal versus 387 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Nohut Unu has 10.85 g and Ararot nişastası has 0 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Nohut Unu 30, Ararot nişastası 1.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.