Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
14 kcal
Score
81 / 100
Napa lahanası has a higher nutrition quality score (88) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
13 vs 14(+7.7%)
Score Diff
88 vs 81(-8.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Napa lahanası
Higher energy
Aysberg marul
Score leader
Napa lahanası
Nutrient split
14 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Napa lahanası and Aysberg marul are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Napa lahanası has 13.0 kcal and Aysberg marul has 14.0 kcal. The difference is 1.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 88 and 81. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Napa lahanası | Aysberg marul | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 22 µg | 25 µg | +13.6% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.04 mg | 0.041 mg | +2.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.06 mg | 0.025 mg | -58.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.12 mg | 0.042 mg | -65.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 260 µg | 299 µg | +15.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 27 mg | 2.8 mg | -89.6% |
| Demir | 0.3 mg | 0.41 mg | +36.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.5 g | 1.2 g | -20.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 13 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 79 µg | 29 µg | -63.3% |
| Fosfor | 29 mg | 20 mg | -31.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 42.9 µg | 24.1 µg | -43.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 40 mg | 18 mg | -55.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 2.97 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 2.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 10 mg | 7 mg | -30.0% |
| Mangan | 0.14 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | 0.123 mg | -69.3% |
| Potasyum | 252 mg | 141 mg | -44.0% |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0.9 g | -25.0% |
| Sodyum | 9 mg | 10 mg | +11.1% |
| Su | 95 g | 95.64 g | +0.7% |
| Toplam Kolin | 11.5 mg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.2 g | 0.14 g | -30.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.2 g | 1.97 g | +64.2% |
| Çinko | 0.21 mg | 0.15 mg | -28.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Napa lahanası and Aysberg marul.
Napa lahanası has less energy per 100 g (13 kcal versus 14 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Napa lahanası has 27 mg and Aysberg marul has 2.8 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Napa lahanası 88, Aysberg marul 81.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.