Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
69 kcal
Score
18 / 100
Mor İncir has a higher nutrition quality score (20) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
74 vs 69(-6.8%)
Score Diff
20 vs 18(-10.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Mor İncir
Higher energy
Mor İncir
Score leader
Mor İncir
Nutrient split
14 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Mor İncir and Alphonse üzümü are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Mor İncir has 74.0 kcal and Alphonse üzümü has 69.0 kcal. The difference is 5.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 20 and 18. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Mor İncir | Alphonse üzümü | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 7 µg | 3 µg | -57.1% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | 0.069 mg | +15.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.05 mg | 0.07 mg | +40.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.113 mg | 0.086 mg | -23.9% |
| Bakir | 0.07 mg | 0.127 mg | +81.4% |
| Beta Karoten | 85 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2 mg | 3.2 mg | +60.0% |
| Demir | 0.37 mg | 0.36 mg | -2.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.9 g | 0.9 g | -69.0% |
| Folat DFE | 6 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 14 mg | 20 mg | +42.9% |
| Fruktoz | 8.06 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 8.2 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.7 µg | 14.6 µg | +210.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 35 mg | 10 mg | -71.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 19.18 g | 18.1 g | -5.6% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 9 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 17 mg | 7 mg | -58.8% |
| Mangan | 0.128 mg | 0.071 mg | -44.5% |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | 0.188 mg | -53.0% |
| Potasyum | 232 mg | 191 mg | -17.7% |
| Protein | 0.75 g | 0.72 g | -4.0% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | — | — |
| Su | 79.11 g | 80.54 g | +1.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.06 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 2 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.07 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.3 g | 0.16 g | -46.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.14 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 16.26 g | 15.48 g | -4.8% |
| Çinko | 0.15 mg | 0.07 mg | -53.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Mor İncir and Alphonse üzümü.
Alphonse üzümü has less energy per 100 g (69 kcal versus 74 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Mor İncir has 4.7 µg and Alphonse üzümü has 14.6 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Mor İncir 20, Alphonse üzümü 18.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.