Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
135 kcal
Score
17 / 100
Misket kavunu has a higher nutrition quality score (54) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
34 vs 135(+297.1%)
Score Diff
54 vs 17(-68.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Misket kavunu
Higher energy
Sakızlı muhallebi
Score leader
Misket kavunu
Nutrient split
5 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Misket kavunu and Sakızlı muhallebi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Misket kavunu has 34.0 kcal and Sakızlı muhallebi has 135.0 kcal. The difference is 101.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 54 and 17. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
13 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Misket kavunu | Sakızlı muhallebi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 169 µg | 28 µg | -83.4% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0.35 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | 0.14 mg | +600.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.07 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.04 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 2020 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 36.7 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.21 mg | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0.9 g | 0.1 g | -88.9% |
| Enerji | — | 565 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 135 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 21 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | — | 75 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 95 mg | +955.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 8.16 g | 23.5 g | +188.0% |
| Kolesterol | — | 10 mg | — |
| Laktoz | — | 3.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 12 mg | 10 mg | -16.7% |
| Niasin | 0.73 mg | — | — |
| Nisasta | — | 5.3 g | — |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.1 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 267 mg | 120 mg | -55.1% |
| Protein | 0.84 g | 2.8 g | +233.3% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 15 g | — |
| Sodyum | 16 mg | 40 mg | +150.0% |
| Su | 90.2 g | 72.5 g | -19.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.19 g | 3.2 g | +1584.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 7.86 g | 18.2 g | +131.6% |
| Çinko | 0.18 mg | 0.35 mg | +94.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Misket kavunu and Sakızlı muhallebi.
Misket kavunu has less energy per 100 g (34 kcal versus 135 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Misket kavunu has 0.19 g and Sakızlı muhallebi has 3.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Misket kavunu 54, Sakızlı muhallebi 17.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.